Share

Mostly Cloudy

Wed

21°C | 12°C

Broken cloud

Thu

20°C | 10°C

Clear spells

Fri

21°C | 13°C

Home   Canterbury   News   Article

Couple Owen and Kathleen Linkins 'forget' £50,000 windfall to claim £25,000 at their Canterbury home

23 June 2014
by Paul Hooper

A Canterbury couple squirrelled away a £50,000 windfall... and then lied to claim nearly £24,000 in benefits.

Now Owen and Kathleen Linkins have been told they have two weeks to stump up the cash out of their secret inheritance.

The pair of fraudsters later claimed they had “forgotten” about the money that they received in 2007 before they began claiming state handouts.

The Linkins falsely claimed benefits. Picture Getty News Images

The Linkins falsely claimed benefits. Picture: Getty News Images



Owen Linkins, 53, of Seymour Place, claimed employment benefits for two years after saying he had had just £384 in their bank account.

Later his wife Kathleen, who appeared at Canterbury Crown Court in a wheelchair, began pocketing more benefits.

They were due for trial in April but then entered guilty pleas to the fraud charges – Owen for claiming £13,600 and his wife £10,380.

But Judge Simon James halted the sentencing hearing after being told that not a penny of the money had yet been returned.

He said: “As I understand it, their offer of repayment forms a substantial part of their mitigation and I am rather surprised to find that none of the money has been repaid.

“It was obviously obtained fraudulently and they were not entitled to it and nor should they have the benefit of it.”

Philip Rowley, defending Mrs Linkins, said: “Having entered their pleas at the magistrates court, an offer was made to make immediate repayment, and what we have been waiting for is where it should be paid.

The case was heard at Canterbury Crown Court

The case was heard at Canterbury Crown Court



“They are in a position to make a repayment effectively immediately.”

He asked for a two-week adjournment for the Linkins to hand back the money once the DWP had provided a banking address.

The judge said: “It is not a case that the defendants can buy themselves out of their responsibilities, but bearing in mind they have the money in their bank account it seems to me it shouldn’t remain there.

“If it were repaid that would be an evidence of their remorse, but I am not making any promises about what the sentences will be."

“As I understand it, their offer of repayment forms a substantial part of their mitigation and I am rather surprised to find that none of the money has been repaid" - Judge Simon James

Prosecutor James Ross told the court: “These were claims which were dishonest from the start. Mr Linkins made a claim for employment and support allowance in March 2009.

“He was asked to certify if he had more than £6,000 in his account. He said his capital was in the region of £384, but in reality the capital was in the region of nearer £60,000.

"He then claimed for 74 weeks until March 2011.

“Mrs Linkins, who had received the inheritance in 2007, then began claiming a week later.

"She said the total amount of savings the couple had was £700. So as soon as one claim ended the other was started", he added.

Click here for more news from Canterbury.

Click here for more news from around the county.

Comments 

Forgotten Password?

Forgotten Username?

Don't have an account? Please Register first!

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227989.