Home   Canterbury   News   Article

Canterbury Crown Court judge Jason Dunn-Shaw sacked for abusive online tirades

By KentOnline reporter

A judge who sat at Canterbury Crown Court has been sacked after he posted abusive comments on KentOnline about cases he was involved in.

Jason Dunn-Shaw used a pseudonym to brand website visitors “donkeys” and “trolls”, accused them of being “narrow-minded and bigoted” and complained “lots of warty fingers at work here” when faced with comments he disapproved of.

He has been removed from judicial office after the “the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice concluded that this behaviour fell below the standard expected”.

Barrister Jason Dunn-Shaw can no longer sit as a judge.

Barrister Jason Dunn-Shaw can no longer sit as a judge.

He has today spoken out to say he will be appealing to the Ombudsman about the decision.

Mr Dunn-Shaw had been the recorder, a part-time judge, in a Canterbury Crown Court case of a woman who avoided going to prison after causing a horrific car crash at Shadoxhurst which left two people in a burning Mini.

Following online criticism of the decision, comments appeared under the username Querelle which sought to explain and justify the actions of the judge. Critics were also described as "donkeys".

In another case reported on KentOnline, a Betteshanger family were convicted of fleecing an 80-year-old dementia sufferer out of £57,000.

Jason Dunn-Shaw sat as a judge at Canterbury Crown Court.

Jason Dunn-Shaw sat as a judge at Canterbury Crown Court.

Mr Dunn-Shaw had been representing the defendants in the case.

Comments subsequently appeared on KentOnline also under the name Querelle which went into great detail about the circumstances.

The fraud victim's son later submitted a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) which oversees disciplinary matters relating to holders of judicial office such as judges, magistrates and coroners.

In a disciplinary statement released today, the JCIO said: “Recorder Jason Dunn-Shaw was subject to a conduct investigation for using a pseudonym to post comments (some of which were abusive) on a newspaper website about a case in which he had been a judge and another in which he had been a barrister. 

“In his own name he also used publicly available social media sites to post material or not remove material which was not compatible with the dignity of judicial office or suggested a lack of impartiality on matters of public controversy.

“The Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice concluded that this behaviour fell below the standard expected of a judicial office holder and have removed Mr Dunn-Shaw from judicial office.”

Nick Lewis, with his mother Barbara, complained to the JCIO after online comments below a report of a court case.

Nick Lewis, with his mother Barbara, complained to the JCIO after online comments below a report of a court case.

The complaint to the JCIO was made in early 2016 by Nick Lewis, son of Barbara Lewis, who was defrauded by the Betteshanger family.

Mr Lewis, 51, said: “It’s a shame that it has taken 14 months for the complaint to be investigated, but at least it’s the right result and he can no longer act as a judge.”

Mr Dunn-Shaw said: "I am dismayed. I have served diligently for a number of years throughout the South East. I have been described as "outstanding" by counsel, jurors and witnesses.

"The JCOI accept that comments were made on KentOnline under a pseudonym.

"Their other condemnation is of comments I made on the pages of Facebook friends which I believed to have been private. The day that I received my sacking was the same day that a judge was exonerated for calling a defendant a "C***" in open court.

"It seems to me unfair that the tracking of anonymous material places me where I am now.
 
"I have a text message from a colleague sent on the December 5 2015 which I have kept because I was proud of it: 'JDS I met someone this evening who described you as the best, fairest tribunal they'd ever appeared before. I'm not one for sentiment, but this was striking and genuine, so I had to pass it on. It resonated with me'.
 
"The JCOI has behaved disgracefully and I am appealing to the Ombudsman.
 
"A High Court judge advised that I should receive a 'formal warning'. The Lord Chief Justice  personally intervened to have me removed from office. 
 
"If it is to be that the judiciary is to be populated by timid and unimaginative 'yes-men' then I am better off out of it - but such degrades our fine heritage of some independently-minded judges who live in the real world."

Join the debate...
Comments |

Don't have an account? Please Register first!

The KM Group does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227989.

Follow us

Like Us on Facebook

Most popular

Live updates

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More