Home   Canterbury   News   Article

Recycler Lewis Bertram of Eco_Matters found guilty of breaching licences by storing too many mattresses

Recycler Lewis Bertram who turned part of a business park into a mattress "mountain" – could face a prison sentence.

The jury, which retired for more than five and a half hours, returned three guilty verdicts involving charges under the Environment Protection Act.

An EPA spokesman said the offences carry a maximum five-year jail term for very serious cases – and/or unlimited fines.

Mattresses stored at the Smarden unit
Mattresses stored at the Smarden unit

Now a Judge has ordered an investigation into whether the premises, rented by Bertram’s company Eco-matters, has cleared the waste.

His barrister told Judge Heather Norton “the site has largely been cleared” but Environment Agency lawyers said piles of waste were still there.

Two businessmen are also claiming that because of the rubbish they have lost out on £11,000 and £35,000 income because of not being able to rent their units on the Smarden Business Park because of the eyesore.

The 51 year old had denied all three charges including breaching his licences between December 11 2014 and June 10 the following year.

Lewis Bertram exits Canterbury Crown Court. Picture: Gary Browne FM4648676
Lewis Bertram exits Canterbury Crown Court. Picture: Gary Browne FM4648676

Environment Agency investigators were called in after complaints from residents, a jury at Canterbury Crown Court was told.

Prosecutor Rebecca Vanstone said Bertram, of Well Street, Loose near Maidstone had “knowingly permitted” waste to be deposited near the units.

“The Environment Agency doesn’t say that Mr Bertram himself deposited the waste but that he allowed it to be deposited with his knowledge and permission.

“The waste included mattresses, bed frames and metal, “ she claimed.

How the site looked
How the site looked

The businessman was also found guilty of failing to provide details under Environment regulations as required by law.

After the jury’s verdict two other charges were put to Bertram about failing to comply with Section 59 EPA orders and he pleaded not guilty.

A hearing at the magistrates court is expect to follow and Bertram will be sentenced for three offences in February when the judge will hear evidence of his company’s turnover.
Judge Norton has asked for details about the cost of clearing up the site – estimated at more than £150,000.

The court heard how Bertram ran his business recycling company and rented two units in the summer of 2013.

The site was visited and pictures taken of the tons of mattresses
The site was visited and pictures taken of the tons of mattresses

“Mattresses would be brought onto the site and stripped of their component parts which would then be sold off,” the prosecutor told the jury.

He had applied to the EA for an “exceptions” which are licences to allow him to treat waste.

Ms Vanstone said Bertram had been given a “T4 Exemption” which allowed him to store 1000 tons of textile waste at one unit and a “T12 Exemption” for five tons of waste which had to be treated inside.

He was also allowed to dismantle 20 tons of divans at any one time, the court heard.
She added: “Three EA officers attended the site from December 2014 until June 2015.and became concerned about the amount of waste stored there.

The mattresses at the site
The mattresses at the site

“They took photographs of the mattresses and they were concerned he was operating outside the terms of his exemptions.

“They served notices on him to remove the waste. That failed to have an effect and later they interviewed him.

“He told them he was the decision-maker for the business and accepted that the site had deteriorated and that he had filled it to over-capacity.”

There is still a huge pile at the site today
There is still a huge pile at the site today

The prosecutor said calculations made by an officer estimated 1116 tons of waste on one unit and 1184 tons on a second unit - amounting to a pile more than five metres high.

“He was operating outside the terms of his exemptions in that he was storing mattresses wood and metal outside one unit and in another for which he had no exemption, “ she added.

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More