You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, February 09 2012

February 24: On expenses and should we know about council officers earnings?

bank notesThere appears to be some nervousness among certain Kent councils over government plans to force them to disclose more details about the pay and perks of their most senior officers.

It seems three – Gravesham, Dover and Tonbridge and Malling – all lobbied the government over the move, which follows widespread adverse publicity over what some have dubbed "fat cat" public sector pay.

The councils between them flagged up concerns that in publishing the names and earnings of their highest paid officials, they might come in for a bit of stick from the public and worse, the media, who – as usual – were accused without any evidence of "misrepresenting" such information.

(The Association of Council Secretaries and Solicitors went even further, suggesting such information might see officers "personally targeted by less stable persons in the community" which seemed rather over the top.)

I can’t say I’ve that much sympathy with these arguments.

In fact, not every council had such a problem with the government’s proposals.

Commendably, some welcomed the initiative. For example, Surrey County Council said it would "improve the transparency of pay and remuneration for senior public servants" while the Fire Officers’ Association said: "It can only be in the public interest to ensure that earnings of public servants are transparent" adding it was information that might "invite challenge of decisions about the worth of senior staff."

Meanwhile, it seems KCC did not respond to the government’s consultation over its proposals. Why, we’ve no idea.

How councils resisted moves to disclose officers pay and perks>>>

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Just how hard politicians have found it to adjust to the new culture of openness ushered in by the Freedom of Information Act was amply demonstrated in a highly entertaining account of the MPs’ expenses scandal on BBC 4 "On Expenses" last night.

At one hour, it rather telescoped the main events but gave overdue recognition to the campaigning journalist Heather Brooke, who was the main agitator in forcing details of claims made by MPs out into the open.

The ostrich mentality of the Commons’ authorities was quite staggering. Worth watching in the I-player or look out for a repeat.

Heather’s website, which contains a lot of good stuff on Freedom of Information,  is here

Wednesday, February 24 2010

Comments are closed

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.