November 26: In The Thick of It

Cllr Nick ChardAS re-organisations go, KCC’s efforts to complete a shake-up of its highways department must be one of the longest on record having been going on since 2006.

A key part of its plans has been the development of highways depots in Ashford and west Kent.

The Ashford depot opened last year but the missing piece of the jigsaw is the as yet un-built depot for west Kent.

Now it seems KCC has suffered another setback and been forced to abandon plans to place the depot on a site near Larkfield, Maidstone.

Instead it plans to develop a site where staff were relocated on a temporary basis in Aylesford, also near Maidstone. Now they'll be relocated to somewhere else while the building work takes place.

Highways chief Cllr Nick Chard insists that this option offers the best value for money option. That maybe the case but why was so much effort expended on trying to find another site after KCC dropped its scheme for a depot at Wrotham off the A20?

The Wrotham proposal hit the buffers in 2008 after KCC decided not to contest a Judicial Review brought by opponents of the scheme.

County councillors were told as recently as this July a deal to buy the land KCC had identified as a replacement site had been agreed but it was dependent on the authority securing planning permission.

Now that plan has been scrapped. It'd be interesting to know exactly how much has been spent not just on this but the whole re-organisation process over four years.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

County HallSpin corner. Or how to put a positive gloss on a potentially negative story.

Complaints made about KCC services are up by 17 per cent with 2,394 formally recorded in 2008-09.

Bad? Not so far as KCC is concerned, judging by its view outlining the details of the data in a committee report:

"It is easy when analysing complaints to assume that an increase or decrease in the number of complaints received reflects a change in the standard of service provided but it is not as straightforward as this. An overall increase in complaints could indicate that a Directorate welcomes complaints and views them as a positive tool for improving services and that people are well informed about how to make a complaint."

The increase "also reflects the fact that people are better informed about how to make acomplaint following the revision of the Complaints, Comments and Compliments leaflet and its increased availability. We are expecting there to be an increase in the number of complaints monitored in 2009/10 in certain business units as we improve how we give information to the public on making a complaint and improve our recording."

Malcolm Tucker, eat your heart out.

Read the full report here

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Thursday, November 26 2009

Commment Bookmark

Visitor Comments

  • Highway Reorganisations Costs

    11/26/2009 5:53:22 PM
    by Dave, Tonbridge

    You wondered how much this has all cost. Accorging to the Kent Libdem website the budget for this was £17.8Millions. In January 2006 capital accommodation investment approved £17,700,000 (net) to develop 3 super depots, these plans were revised in summer 2006 to relocate to 2 super depots and 2 satellite depots The net savings on revised programme was estimated at £3,400,000 with an annual revenue savings of £53,000. However the model requires significant investment in mobile technology and business systems, estimated at £3,700,000, so no net saving on the revised programme, infact an additional £300,000 investment. Presumably this new technology is part of the reason that us the public have been able to complain and KCC have been able to record every complaint. But in business you will find that those companies that spend the most on systems to handle complaints ae the ones that have the most complaints!

  • Another good spin

    11/29/2009 6:23:51 PM
    by Dave, Tonbridge

    I dont believe it! On KCC's front web page is an article about Kent Health Watch. They are blowing the trumpet because in just over a year they have now had 500 callers. Yes one and a bit calls per day. If my memory serves mw right this service costs £300,000 for the first year. If these costsa are true then thats about £600 per call. Not a great success but it makes Kent TV look a bargain at 80p per hit! I think the cabinet member for Health should reveal the costs. I know for the people concerned it may have been a great help but KCC was just duplicating existing services like PALS and the Kent LINk services as well as just contacting your PCT but that politics for you.

Add a comment.

   

Type the numbers you see in the picture below.
Type the numbers you see in this picture.
 


Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.