September 23: Ed Balls and Mr Carter square up over Kent schools

Cllr Paul Carter, Kent County Council leaderThere's no concealing the fury at County Hall over a decision by Ed Balls, the education secretary, to tell KCC it was sending in "expert advisers" to lift classroom standards at its poorly-performing secondary schools.

Ed Balls sends in "troubleshooters" to Kent>>>

KCC Conservative leader Paul Carter is incandescent over the intervention and has already fired off an angry letter to Mr Balls over the matter.

He has pointed out that over recent years, the performance of most secondary schools has improved and the authority has just posted some of its best GCSE results ever.

Having said that, the Government was never going to launch an initiative aimed at improving standards and then not say anything about progress being made - or, as Ed Balls sees it, progress not being made fast enough.

So KCC can not be surprised that with such a large tail of supposedly under-achieving schools - the largest number in the country - the secretary of state has highlighted the fact.

He might have been rather more diplomatic about the matter but I suspect that's not his style.

It is the case that between them, the Kent schools in this group are having considerable sums of additional money spent on them (as you can see here) and any Government will want to see a return on its investment like that).

Politically, there are a couple of points worth making.

Ed Balls is seen as a potential successor to Mr Brown and the announcement that he is daring to  intervene in the country's largest selective authority will no doubt play will with the left-leaning elements of the party.

And it is not so disadvantageous to Cllr Carter. In robustly confronting the secretary of state, his own credentials as a firm supporter of selection are given an airing.

With the likelihood of a change of Government, however, the row may just be a proverbial storm in a tea cup.

I can't see a future Conservative government cracking the whip against Kent in quite the same way and wonder whether the National Challenge initiative will go by the wayside in any case.

But what would replace it?

A Conservative government is no different in that respect from Labour. It too would have to have its own policy on lifting standards at under-achieving schools. The question is whether it will be able to resist leaving it to education authorities to sort out.

Knowing politicians and their chronic inability to stand aside whatever they might say about de-centralising, I suspect not.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  

 

 

Wednesday, September 23 2009

Commment Bookmark

Visitor Comments

  • Incandescent?

    9/24/2009 10:37:34 AM
    by Anemone

    Paul Carter would be a good deal more incandescent if he had to send his own grandchildren to one of the 20% of failing schools in Kent. He wouldn't though would he? Unfortunately, that's the offer for a fifth of secondary school children and KCC have systematically failed to deliver for such a significant group. The children of the articulate voter are catered for in selective schools and it is those who vote who call the tune for such as Mr Carter. It is good that the government is lifting the veil on this situation in Kent education.

Add a comment.

   

Type the numbers you see in the picture below.
Type the numbers you see in this picture.
 


Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.