You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

February 23: Why the Downing Street bullying saga won't affect much

Gordon BrownAS I expected, Ann Widdecombe quit as the patron of the National Bullying Helpline late yesterday as the swirl of allegations against Downing Street and the charity itself grew.

She did so "with regret" but I suspect she quickly realised that the charity’s credibility was fatally damaged after its chief executive chose to go public with revelations that it had been contacted by Downing Street staff about concerns over bullying.

Is the row damaging Labour? It’s bound to have had some impact but I feel that this is one of those "Westminster Village" stories – or Washington beltway stories - which makes for a great yarn for political observers and others but ultimately has little real consequences for either Labour or the other parties.

For some, the story will simply reinforce perceptions that Gordon Brown is not the easiest of people to rub along with.

A lot of politicians do have furious tempers, blowing up at the slightest thing and get rather cross about what’s written about them in the media.

Many are relentlessly single-minded – often, it’s how they have got to where they are – but whether voters make up their minds at the ballot box on their perceived or actual temperamental deficiencies is another thing altogether.

Personality does of course come into  it, of course and it's better for a politician to have a "likeability factor" than not to have one. But it is only part of the equation. 

Interestingly, the latest batch of opinion polls suggest the bullying saga has made very little difference to the parties’ respective ratings.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Kent County Council’s Conservative administration had at one stage toyed with trying to set a zero council tax increase but wasn’t quite able to.

Had it done so, I wonder if we might have seen the council publicise its achievement in the rather novel way that the London borough of Haringey has done – by plastering adverts in a pop art style on the side of rubbish lorries, which is an interesting choice.

Read the story here

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It’s not a sobriquet that many local government officials are given but KCC’s chief legal eagle Geoff Wild has been described admiringly as one of its "poster boys" in an article detailing the authority’s latest venture in its burgeoning legal empire, as you can read here.

Can a calendar be far behind?

Let’s hope his colleagues don’t get too green eyed.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

KCC is making cautiously optimistic noises about the remaining £45million it still has tied up in Icelandic banks. We shall see - whatever the outcome, it won't, as Cllr John Simmonds says, be a quick one.

KCC optimistic over Iceland cash - read our story here>>

Interestingly, it seems councils are trying to take a low key position on the issue. The Local Government Association has not posted on its website any bulletins up-dating developments for councils since September.

You can read these up-dates here

 

Tuesday, February 23 2010

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (1)

Comments closed

  • Dave, Tonbridge wrote:

    Legal team looses KCC Money

    So KCC are claiming that their legal team earned £1.4 profit for the county. But you reported on the 8th Feb that as part of the technical costs of the Building Schools for the Future program, that KCC has spent £1.5 millions on lawyers fee. Thats a loss in anybodies money.
    I hope that KCC declaring the time of all staff, all office spaces and part of the allowance of any councillors that iis in volved in this commercial enterprise. Otherwise its unfair competition. Once again KCC is playing at being a private company. Not what is intended for county councils. KCC are already taking business out of the mouths of many companies, People that have risked their own money. KCC has no such risks criteria, they just speculate with our money. They are now adding lawyers to the transport companies, temp agencies, office supplies, landscape gardening, IT staff, builders, the list goes on. Far better that Kent's business are allowed to prosper rather than a a few pounds being trimmed from the council tax.

    Its all very well for KCC to claim they will eventualy get most of the Icelandic Bank money back but what of the millions in lost interest for the time they are waiting for pay back?

    23 Feb 2010 7:06 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.