You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Vice chancellor defends £9k tuition fee plan

Professor Julia Goodfellow, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Kent, and John Fitzpatrick, Director of Kent Law Clinic and Senior Lecturer at Kent Law School, receive the Law Clinic's Queen's Anniversary Award from the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh.

by Trevor Sturgess

tsturgess@thekmgroup.co.uk

Kent University's vice chancellor has defended its controversial decision to charge students £9,000 a year from 2012, warning a lower fee would mean job losses and other cutbacks.

But Professor Julia Goodfellow insisted a rise in fee waivers and bursaries, especially for students from poorer backgrounds, would reduce the average to around £8,000.

The government had expected most universities to charge £6,000, with only a handful going for the permitted maximum of £9,000.

However, ministers have been surprised by the high number opting for the higher fee, alarmed by a potential massive loan bill.

It has prompted a veiled threat from Business Secretary Vince Cable to cap student numbers.

Prof Goodfellow said the university faced steep cuts in Government grants towards teaching and capital investment and a lower fee risked the university's future.

It already cost between £10,000 and £12,000 to educate a student.

"We would have become a non-sustainable institution if we'd charged £6,000," she told the Gazette in an exclusive interview."

"It became clear to us that in order to sustain the university on this wonderful campus in Canterbury and the campus in Medway, we would have to charge the higher rate."

She added:"A lower fee would mean fewer jobs and not as good an experience for the student at a time when they are going to be demanding more. That's certainly not good for the region."

Asked what she thought about the new system of student and university financing, she replied: "Our democratically-elected government has chosen this system and we will obviously work with it."

She accepted that parents and young people would be worried about the new fees but said more help would be available for students from poorer backgrounds.

Loans would only be repayable when the graduate earned more than £21,500, and at nine per cent of income above that level.

It was hard to calculate how the fee would affect student applications, but she accepted there could be a small reduction.

However, Kent University was popular and she did not expect that to change.

All the evidence showed that despite the current economic situation, graduates still had a better chance of a good job with higher pay than young people without a degree.

She had this message for anxious families: "Come and talk to us. See what the reality is. Don't automatically write it off."

The university has an annual turnover of £170m and employs nearly 3,000 people.

Its case for higher fees will be considered by the Office for Fair Access (OFFA), with a decision due by mid-July.

Tuesday, April 12 2011

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (5)

Comments closed

  • Wayward Vagabond wrote:

    Still no news about what Kent will charge their foreign students. I have a feeling it's going to be 3times the 9k amount...mind you foreigners get nothing in terms of help from even their own country.

    : ( UKC please don't. UK uni's are nice (lot of them anyway) and Kent is good. Paying the 10k amount right now is hard enough. Paying 3 times the 9k amount, forget it, I'm going home.

    14 Apr 2011 11:34 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Mr Eric Mann wrote:

    Here's a question for all those objecting to tuition fees. As a taxpayer, why should I as someone who has no children, pay through my taxes for the tuition fees of those who choose to go onto higher education? Why should I have to pay for a choice made by other people's children?

    13 Apr 2011 11:28 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Jay wrote:

    Let see what level Canterbury Christ Church put their fees, if they are cheaper I will opt for them as they have increased their profile in recent years and seem on par with Kent uni.

    13 Apr 2011 2:48 PM

    Report Abuse

  • dunn in medway wrote:

    So let me get this right, if you come from "poorer" background, where maybe neither parents work, and the state (us) supports them then you get help. If you hold a non British passport, then you also get help (fact). But if you are a hard working middle income British family, then you get no help.
    Why are our kids being penalised by being forced into huge debts, just because we work hard and try to do our best for them.
    So glad to be British.

    13 Apr 2011 11:00 AM

    Report Abuse

  • bob wrote:

    i can understand the need to raise fees in some quarters, but could somebody tell me what exactly does it mean to come from a poorer background. i bet it does'nt apply to any body earning 1p over the minimum wage.

    13 Apr 2011 9:01 AM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.