You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Crab and Winkle cycle line bridges approved

awilliams@thekmgroup.co.uk

The Crab and Winkle cycle path extension has moved a step closer.

City councillors approved plans on Tuesday night to install two pedestrian bridges across Teynham Road, the railway line and Old Bridge Road. They will link newly extended sections of the line between All Saints Close and Northwood Road, which were granted planning permission in September 2009.

Councillors adjourned debate on the application last month to allow for a site visit. Members of the development control committee met with concerned residents in neighbouring streets to hear how the bridges could overlook their houses and gardens.

Other objectors cited a lack of consideration for alternative, less imposing structures and obtaining permission to build on Network Rail owned land.

Julie Street, from the Whitstable Green Lung Association, described the bridges as more akin to motorway structures.

She said: “There’s also a lack of local support for these bridges. Less than a third of the letters of support received by the council actually come from people living in Whitstable.

“You could easily deliver a cycle route using road crossings and traffic lights, which is more cost-effective and would improve safety for both pedestrians and motorists.”

Five councillors opposed granting the planning application. Whitstable and Chestfield councillors Jenny Samper (Con), Julia Seath (Lab) and Ian Thomas (Con) were joined by Ida Linfield (Lib Dem) and Evelyn Bisset (Con) in voting against the bridges. Hazel McCabe (Con) abstained from voting.

Julia Seath said: “This has been the most difficult planning application for me to consider in all my time as a councillor.

“From the outset, I have supported the principle of extending the route. But, my concerns rest entirely on the impact these bridges will have on people’s quality of life for those living nearby.”

Read more reaction to the decision in this week's Whitstable Gazette, out Thursday.

Wednesday, March 09 2011

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (2)

Comments closed

  • Old Jim wrote:

    How would it "improve safety for both pedestrians and motorists" by having a "route using road crossings and traffic lights" compared to the proposed path which has no cars and no road crossings?

    09 Mar 2011 5:14 PM

    Report Abuse

  • david wrote:

    Traffic lights will slow traffic down causing more pollution from stationary vehicles, traffic lights cost money to run with maintenance and electricty ( I know with LED's it is cheaper). In the long term bridges would be more cost-effective and can be designed with a sympathetic eye to the local area.

    09 Mar 2011 1:47 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.