MP expenses claim ignites fresh row
Comments |
Exclusive by political editor Paul Francis
A Kent MP claimed nearly £4,700 to pay an American-based
consultancy firm to help him make better speeches in Parliament, we
can reveal.
Tunbridge Wells MP Greg Clark, a Conservative frontbencher,
claimed £4,648 on his expenses to cover the costs of a personal
course aimed at improving his speech-making in the House of
Commons.
The claim was submitted in 2006 under the category of incidental
expenses and was approved by the Commons authorities.
Documents for Mr Clark’s claims show that he was provided with a
tailor-made course by Tai Resources Limited for what was described
as a “Training Course in Parliamentary Speechmaking.”
The course included eight one-to-one coaching sessions, each
lasting four hours in addition to “ad hoc support for specific
needs.”
Tai Resources is based in America and is described on its
website as a “boutique consulting firm pioneering new directions in
executive leadership and organizational change”.
Among its corporate clients are American Express, the US Naval
Academy and the British banking group Lloyds TSB.
Mr Clark’s customised coaching programme took place in London at
Westminster.
The shadow secretary of state for energy and climate
change
said it was a legitimate and permissible claim as expenses were
allowed to cover training for MPs.
He said: “I’ve always tried continually to improve how I can
represent my constituents most effectively. Most people in
most jobs are required to undergo training from time to time, and I
don’t see why MPs should be above the need to learn. Training
for members is specifically cited as one of the purposes of the
office costs allowance. During the course of this Parliament I will
have spent about half of what the average UK business spends
training each employee, so I don’t think this is unreasonable.”
He had asked Tai to carry out the training because they were “an
excellent training company used by many leading firms...they
operate in Britain as well as around the world. All of the
training was undertaken in Parliament - no travel costs were
incurred. I learned a huge amount from the course I took with
them.”
Under Parliamentary rules, the Incidental Expenses Provision
(IEP) can be used to meet the cost of accommodation for office or
surgery use; equipment and supplies for office or surgery; work
commissioned or other services and certain travel and
communications.
Friday, June 26 2009
Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button or contact us here.