You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Rubbish bin in Ashford's shared space cost £1,500

Bins costing £1,500 each - and more than £4,000 spent on a bench!

That is how the costs for the shared space 'street furniture' have added up.

Stainless steel bin in Ashford's shared space

Now one council chief has admitted too much was spent on the pioneering Ashford ring road scheme.

Cllr Keith Ferrrin, KCC cabinet member for highways, was responding to details of costs, obtained under Freedom of Information by the Kentish Express, showing how the £15.9m budget was spent.

It reveals how stainless steel rubbish bins cost £1,500 each, cycle racks nearly £400 each and the designer of controversial lamp-posts charged a fee of more than £20,000.

Cllr Ferrin (Con), below, said: "My own view is that all this stuff has cost a fortune and it is not justified and should not have happened. If I had been involved earlier, then I would have moved to stop some of this happening.

"I do not think these prices were justified and I am not one of those who believes they had to be paid for the scheme."

We revealed earlier this year how streetlights in the shared space area cost £7,000 each – seven times more than a conventional lamppost.

The figures show the rubbish bins are not the only feature of the ring road revamp that cost a four-figure sum.Cllr Keith Ferrin

The same company that provided the bins also provided the wooden and steel benches, like the ones off Bank Street.

Pause for a rest on one of these and you will be sitting on a piece of street furniture that cost an eye-watering £1,870.

But even that was dwarfed by the £4,100 spent on a prototype timber and stone bench, which can now be seen at Forge Lane.

More than £31,000 was spent on the 36 wooden bollards that can be seen along Elwick Road by the entrance to Debenhams and at other entrances to County Square, an average of £700 each.

A further £5,953 was spent on the granite benches along Bank Street.

For a special report, including the full 'shopping list', see our exclusive report in this week's Kentish Express

Thursday, May 21 2009

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (5)

Comments closed

  • dacky wrote:

    money

    councils will always waste money they know nothing diffrent bonuses mean spend bigger paypackets

    17 Sep 2009 9:53 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Chris Pannell wrote:

    Council moey wasters

    An endlessly repeated sorry tale. Somebody gets a FOA request, often after a struggle, only to find that our highly-paid council executives have wasted yet more public money on some lampposts or "street furniture" or themselves, whereas even the least business-savvy market trader would not have paid that much. Why are these people saying that "you have to pay the highest salaries to get the best". The best what? I could broker a deal better than paying 20k for a lamppost or 1.5k for a trash bin, and I could do it in my sleep, and for a lot less than these fat-cats are screwing out of the public. These people are a total waste of space. And money. Chuck them out on their heads.

    21 May 2009 3:29 PM

    Report Abuse

  • robert wrote:

    Rubbish bin in Ashford's shared space cost £1,500

    How much longer must e put up with KKC wasting money on foolhardy schemes?

    21 May 2009 2:55 PM

    Report Abuse

  • david wrote:

    shared space scandal

    Typical of politicians and council officials. They do not worry how they spend other peoples money, because they can not be brought to account. It is a scandal.

    21 May 2009 2:32 PM

    Report Abuse

  • An Ashfordian wrote:

    You get what you pay for

    The whole point of the ring road regeneration is to make Ashford better and more attractive.

    The new ring road is a bit bizarre, but that in itself is great. We want interesting and bizarre. For too long Ashford has been down-at-heel Anywhere-ton.

    If Ashford's regeneration looked cheap would we be paying any less tax? No.

    Probably the opposite, because cheaper street furniture probably wouldn't last as long.

    Cllr Ferrin is being disingenuous and populist in his comments because there is an election coming. He signed off on the project so he can't whinge now.

    This is not MPs expenses, this is about good investment in something the everyone can appreciate, or at least have an opinion on. What's wrong with that?

    21 May 2009 2:10 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.