You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Kent County Council splashed out for meal at top restaurant

The taxpayer picked up the tab for a meal hosted by county council chiefs at an exclusive London restaurant that cost nearly £360, an investigation by the KM Group has found.

The dinner took place at Rules restaurant in Covent Garden in the heart of London in January.

It was charged to the chief executive’s credit card as official council business.

Details of the meal have come to light following an examination of receipts and expenses charged on county council credit cards between 2009-2010.

While all the claims were cleared under the authority’s rules, the previously unpublished details of the meal are bound to raise eyebrows.

The evening dinner at Rules took place barely a fortnight after KCC announced its budget and a pay freeze for thousands of staff.

A claim sheet submitted by former chief executive Peter Gilroy described it as a "working dinner with government consultants" to discuss Total Place – a government initiative encouraging councils and others to cut costs by sharing assets.

It was attended by Mr Gilroy, council leader Paul Carter and David Lewis, the council’s head of corporate property. The two guests were the chairman of the Kent Property Board, Jonathan Harris and Tim Campbell, of Tim Campbell Associates.

The group enjoyed a meal that included foie gras terrine, native oysters, loin of deer, sirloin steak and a rack of lamb.

Two bottles of wine – one that cost £39.50 - accompanied the meal. KCC says that the council leader had since paid £15 towards the costs of the wine.

Our examination of claims has also uncovered:

  • A trip to Edinburgh Film Festival involving an overnight stay in a five-star hotel that cost more than £800
  • A business breakfast at Maidstone’s Hilton hotel – barely two miles from County Hall - between the chief constable and chief executive costing £47.85
  • A number of other restaurant meals variously described as "working lunches" or "working suppers."

In response to questions we asked about the claims, KCC said in a statement that there were valid reasons for all.

KCC credit card bill

Asked why Rules was chosen rather than somewhere cheaper, or at County Hall, KCC said: "The chairman [of the property board] has travelled to numerous board meetings in Kent and on this occasion, central London was chosen as the appropriate venue."

Discussions at the dinner focused on "what was needed to be done to unlock value in the public property both in Kent and across the country".

Will taxpayers' swallow KCC's explanation for its wining and dining? Read Paul's blog here>>>

The visit last July to the Edinburgh Film Festival by chief executive and deputy county council leader Alex King was to celebrate the nomination of a film "The Calling" for an award.

KCC contributed £75,000 to the film.

The pair stayed overnight at the five-star Sheraton Hotel at a cost of £270 while flights with BA cost £438.

KCC said: "They attended because, in light of the award, it was considered important to launch the Film Development Fund at such a prestigious event, maximising Kent’s profile to the filming industry."

Cheaper flights were considered but "availability and timings proved difficult" because of other commitments.What do you think? Join the debate by adding your comments below

The Sheraton Hotel was booked as "it was the closest to the other venues visited and limited the cost of travelling".

Asked why the chief executive and chief constable met for breakfast at a hotel, the council said: "This was an early meeting at 7.30am.

"The venue was chosen as somewhere that would enable the Chief Constable to get straight on the motorway to get to his next appointment."

The pair, along with Tanya Oliver, KCC’s director of public access, discussed the KCC film bill and various child protection issues in Thanet.

Speaking today, council leader Paul Carter said: "The costs came out at about £40 or £50 a head.

"We could have booked a business room and held a meeting and probably spent more than we did.

"The two guests had done an enormous amount of work for the county council free of charge and occasionally it is appropriate to reward people who have given their time freely."

He went on to say that he had paid for all the wine out of his own pocket, although that appeared to contradict a statement provided by KCC said he had contributed £15 of the drinks bill.

Opposition Liberal Democrat spokesman Cllr Tim Prater said: "I am almost speechless.

"Quite what the purpose of this dinner was, I do not know.

"I do not think there can be any justification for a meal that cost £360 and was charged to the taxpayer.

"It's not as if central London is short of cheaper places to eat.

"There are a lot of unanswered questions, not least what rules KCC has to ensure that when credit cards are used, we get the best value for money."

Thursday, August 05 2010

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (18)

Comments closed

  • linda ring wrote:

    they are clearly taking the micky

    24 Apr 2011 11:03 PM

    Report Abuse

  • CaptainFog wrote:

    Lets bear in mind - Peter Gilroy's salary was over £200k pa before he left - Paul Carter gets around £60k in 'expenses' - which essentially is a salary without having to pay tax! Why do PC and PG think it is okay to claim for the food - whether they are in london or Kent they would eat anyway - so why cant they spend this out of their salaries like other kcc staff would? Tis isnt so much about the amount but the hypocrosy of the way people like this expect to get a 'free lunch' at tax payers expense when they already get paid far more than they are worth. The trouble is that there is a majority of people in Kent who would vote for a donkey if it had a blue badge - which is why we get people like PC elected again and again - even thogh his track record of losing / wasting money is appalling. Why PC thinks he is the right person to reduce savings in the LA is beyond me. He should resign and let people uncontaminated with greed and waste do the job.

    13 Aug 2010 5:14 PM

    Report Abuse

  • sarah wrote:

    nice to see my £1,400 council tax is being put to good use.

    09 Aug 2010 10:48 AM

    Report Abuse

  • George wrote:

    Whilst I agree it appears to be a poor decision what I find hard to understand is all the abuse by some people posting comments. If they don't like it there is an answer - give up your own time and stand for election. You have exactly the same chance as anyone else and let's see what change you make. Will watch with interest.

    09 Aug 2010 7:19 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Ray Parker wrote:

    When you vote Tory in Kent this is the kind of thing you're voting for!

    08 Aug 2010 6:34 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Alec wrote:

    Why are these bloated bureaucrats allowed apparent free access to so much of our money, to spend in venues of their choice, with menus of their choice and apparently no capping on the bill. Why do they have a free hand and such pathetic excuses as "proximity to the motorway"? If they are so infirm I suggest they shouldn't be there.

    Genuine transparency and accountability are urgently called for. Stop these old farts from being in office and lining their already full pockets and stomachs NOW!

    07 Aug 2010 3:58 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Alastair wrote:

    Nice that these freeloaders can spend £360 of our (taxpayers)money, whilst at the same time trying to close or sell old peoples homes ( because KCC cant afford them!). They are all corrupt and either get massive ' members allowance' or very high wages, whilst those delivering the service to the public get pay cuts or pay freeze. We teh rate payers need to ask more about waht is going on at KCC, we need more FOI requests to them, let them tell the truth for once!

    06 Aug 2010 7:41 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Dave wrote:

    Its a pity that at the last KCC elections, the voters of Kent voted according to national party politics and not on the ways KCC was being run. The Icelandic Bank affair, publicity and Kent TV waste of millions, Highways poor record, high salaries and bonus for senior managers were soon forgotten. As were the new schools built and planned funded by Labour.

    Just maybe at the next elections voting will still be on a national basis.

    06 Aug 2010 5:47 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Gareth wrote:

    These people simply cannot be trusted to minimise their 'personal' business expenditure - they clearly attempt to get away with a 'bit of a jolly' and 'fiddle' their expenses where possible. Quite the WRONG type of person to be in a position of financial trust. I think the media should ask council members how many personal defaults and CCJ's they have between them, you may be suprised ;-)

    06 Aug 2010 5:05 PM

    Report Abuse

  • kay mcLoughlin wrote:

    @Trevor what you thinking on? and mind they don't dock your wages for ooh'ing time! lol

    06 Aug 2010 2:24 PM

    Report Abuse

  • janet wrote:

    Whatever happened to holding meetings in board rooms, with a cup of coffee and a plate of biscuits provided. In todays climate, it is totally irresponsible to arrange breakfast meetings at hotels, or meetings over dinner/breakfast. surely the KCC representatives live in Kent, the two guests are Kent businessmen, so why not support your own local restaurants in Kent, if it is unavoidable to have to have meetings while you fill your face. What is the appeal of travelling up to London, and supporting the London businesses with our money

    06 Aug 2010 2:12 PM

    Report Abuse

  • kevin lear wrote:

    Maybe I should invite some business people out for a nice,overpriced meal,and then deduct the amount from my council tax bill, that funds these unnecessary jollies that kcc seem so keen to attend.Somehow,I don't think I would quite get away with it!

    06 Aug 2010 1:46 PM

    Report Abuse

  • clare wrote:

    lets all be honest here....we dont begrudge a "free" working lunch but why cant they have a reasonably priced sandwich from subway? lol

    06 Aug 2010 1:02 PM

    Report Abuse

  • West Malling Resident wrote:

    I don’t begrudge the council spending a few hundred pounds on the finer aspects of public service. The sums here are wholly insignificant compared to the £1,400,000 start up and £600,000 running costs of ‘Kent TV’ – a service no council ever needs to provide and which was unknown by 99.9% of the Kentish people until they found out just how much it was costing them. Indeed, it must be asked why KCC are funding a film to the tune of £75,000 when there is a pay freeze and services are being scaled back.

    KCC and Paul Carter you listen to the people of Kent, before funding anything with money from our pockets ask: ‘Is this an essential service which needs to be provided for the people of Kent?’ For example: schools, roads, social services... I think you will find the answer regarding Kent TV, frolicking in London restaurants and riding the gravy train (or plane) to the Edinburgh Film Festival is a resounding NO!

    06 Aug 2010 12:37 PM

    Report Abuse

  • edward wrote:

    Its sounds like snouts in the trough,i bet if they had to pay it themselves it would a lot less.

    06 Aug 2010 10:50 AM

    Report Abuse

  • SW wrote:

    A working lunch in my company is where we buy in a selection of sandwiches, fruit & juice from M&S or Waitrose, present them on foil platters and eat in the office with our clients..... at a cost of approx £5 - £8 per head per meeting.

    We shop online for hotel and travel discounts (car hire / train & air fares).

    Genuine business people these days are realistic through necessity and don't expect first class travel, accommodation & dining.

    06 Aug 2010 10:22 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Trevor Brill wrote:

    So. My already barely adequate wage is frozen while the Guv'nor blows my weeks wages on lunch.

    Ooo....Kay. I'll think on it.

    06 Aug 2010 10:14 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Kay McLoughlin wrote:

    Ok let me just clarify this... it was a 'working dinner' to 'cut costs' and 'a government initiative'?

    The dinner guests were from the private sector, and the advantage of doing business with KCC would be of financial benefit to them yet KCC, i.e. the taxpayer footed the bill?

    Although saying that they were from the private sector I could only find Tim Campbell's details and company but can find no record of Jonathan Harris, Chairman of the Kent Property Board.

    Is this a fictional person, chairman of a fictional board to justify the cost of the dinner?

    An answer to this question would be appreciated as I would like to be able to google someone who can be a guest at such a dinner and hope to get a result.

    As for some of the hotel bills have these people not heard of Travelodge or Premier Inn?

    Yet another example of overpaid bureaucrats spending taxpayers money how they see fit with no justification for their actions.

    06 Aug 2010 9:33 AM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.