You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, February 09 2012

Kent leader: are academy schools worth it?

School academies have come under the spotlight after the leader of Kent County Council said he was concerned about their admissions, high level of exclusions and standards.

Cllr Paul Carter flagged up his misgivings as the authority, which is already a co-sponsor of several academies, agreed to move ahead with the development of a further batch of five.

They include academies for secondary schools in Dover, Ashford, Maidstone and Sevenoaks.

Speaking at a cabinet meeting on Monday Cllr Carter (Con) said he was concerned the Government’s academy programme could be as divisive as the former Conservative policy of allowing schools to opt out of council control.

While he said academies remained an important part of Kent’s "mixed economy" of schools, he questioned whether the huge investment was delivering the results.

Why doubts have surfaced over academies: read our political editor's blog here>>>

He also said Kent was unlikely to approve more academy plans because the authority lost money needed to maintain crucial support services for all its schools.

"I have a concern about the rate of exclusions, the failure to admit vulnerable people and the attainment level of academies," he said.

It was "extraordinary" that "academies can refuse to admit some of the most vulnerable young people under the current admissions."

"I do have some concerns with some of the rules and regulations that surround academies. We have to be very careful that we do not [end up] with the very worst of the grant maintained system, which was extraordinarily divisive between community and grant maintained schools," added Cllr Carter.

That was a reference to the former Conservative policy in the 1980s of allowing schools to opt out of council control and be directly funded by Government, much like the academy programme.

Mr Carter added it was "very regrettable" that KCC lost money it would otherwise have to pay for support services because academies were funded directly by the Government and it was top-sliced from the council’s budget.

"We are going to have to suggest that 14 academies [is enough] otherwise we would be really hard pressed to provide the essentially needed support services."

On standards, he said: "I do not want to be bitchy but the vast majority of our National Challenge schools have improved but under 50 per cent of academies have not delivered."

Kent has 33 schools identified by the Government as under-performing although many have already reached or are close to the target for 30 per cent of pupils to achieve five or more good GCSEs.

A study published by experts at the London School of Economics last year said the results of academies were statistically indistinguishable from comprehensives.

The next five academies planned for Kent are: The Skinners’ Kent Academy at Tunbridge Wells, which opened in September 2009 (formerly Tunbridge Wells High School); Knole Academy, Sevenoaks; Archers Court Academy, Dover; Christchurch Academy, Ashford; Astor of Hever, Maidstone.

Tuesday, January 12 2010

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (2)

Comments closed

  • Linda Casey wrote:

    Kent Academies

    How bizarre that Paul Carter should say - It was "extraordinary" that "academies can refuse to admit some of the most vulnerable young people under the current admissions." That is exactly what the grammar schools, which Mr Carter promotes, do! Also he is concerned about them being divisive - what could be more divisive of communities than the 11+ system? A few months ago Mr Carter was vociferous in his outrage at Mr Balls' identification of national challenge schools in Kent - now he says the government initiative is working. Kent's low achieving schools can be attributed directly to the 11+ - it's called the 'self-fulfilling prophecy'.

    13 Jan 2010 5:32 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Dave, Tonbridge wrote:

    Kent Academies

    The argument that KCC cannot afford to operate support services if more academies are set up does not hold water. Hopefully the support services have already been cut back with the acadedmies that have already been set up. Other smaller LEA such as Medway run far fewer school and never complain they have too few schools under their control. I think KCC are just trying to stop their powers being eroded. Bring on splitting Kent into 3 unitary council to save money.

    12 Jan 2010 3:43 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.