You are not currently logged in.
Tuesday, February 07 2012

Grammars can still select pupils as academies: Government

Ministers have moved to reassure grammar schools that they can continue to select pupils if they become academies.

The assurance came amid concerns that under the coalition government's plans, schools that became academies could change their admissions arrangements and become all-ability.

About a third of Kent's grammar schools have registered an interest in becoming academies among a total of more than 100 primary and secondary schools in Kent and Medway.

Schools minister Nick Gibb insisted there was no question that the selective admissions or the 11-plus would end if grammars opted to become academies.

He was responsding to a question tabled at Westminster by Chatham and Aylesford MP Tracey Crouch (Con).

Grammar schools had been warned off applying for academy status by the National Grammar Schools Association (NGSA). It advised schools to proceed with "extreme caution" in view of the potential "covert dangers" of the policy.

The organisation's chairman, Robert McCartney, claimed parents might not be consulted about a subsequent decision to change admissions arrangements and let in pupils of all abilities.

Ms Crouch said: "I am delighted by what the minister said. There was some concern after the statement put out by NGSA when it was quite clear that under the plans that grammars could remain selective."

She defended the move to allow outstanding schools to be fast-tracked under the government's programme, saying that it would allow education authorities to focus on helping schools with problems.

"Rather than drain council resources, these schools will be able to remove themselves from local authority allowing authorities to focus on those that need most help," the MP said.

Eleven grammar schools graded as outstanding have expressed an interest in becoming an academy. They are Tonbridge Grammar School; The Judd School; Barton Court; Maidstone Grammar School; The Skinners School; Highsted Grammar; the Weald of Kent Grammar; Dartford Grammar and Simon Langton Girls Grammar and Chatham and Clarendon House grammars.

 

Tuesday, July 13 2010

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (4)

Comments closed

  • Stephen Elliott wrote:

    Now that Graham Brady's amendment seeking protection for academic selection has been withdrawn during the second reading of the academies Bill Tracey Crouch must know that the reassurance offered by Nick Gibb was worthless. Her veiled criticism of the NGSA was misguided and foolish. She should apologise for getting this wrong.
    Why do Conservative MP participate in silly charades?

    24 Jul 2010 8:32 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Nick Seaton wrote:

    Yes and talking about financial incentives, heads know they can double their salaries if they become 'executive head' of more than one school. If they take redundancy or early retirement instead, they can probably draw up to £200,000 in a lump sum. Nice work if you can get it, so no wonder they want to federate two or more schools and become academies.

    14 Jul 2010 4:51 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Stephen Elliott wrote:

    One must wonder about the motivation for young Tracey Crouch MP to raise such an ill-defined yet important question of Mr Gibb. The devil will be hidden in the details of the Bill. Undoubtedly the headmasters that she spoke to prior to laying down the soft-ball question and opportunity to deflect from the NGSA warning must know of the limitations and constraints of the Academies Bill since they have, without consultation with parents, supported the move. However dogs on the street know that selection on academic ability at 11 for a grammar school is not the same as selection by specialism, selection by postcode, selection by faith etc. The NGSA have raised the alarm about heads with financial incentives to link up to academies that swallow up grammar schools. It is the governors, including parents that are legally responsible for grammar schools - not the heads. Ms Crouch must do better.

    14 Jul 2010 3:50 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Nick Seaton wrote:

    As a Member of Parliament, isn't Tracey Crouch being rather naive to accept a minister's bland assurance that if grammar schools 'were to become academies they would retain their selective status?'
    We already know that. What matters, as the NGSA has pointed out, is that in a couple of years time they cannot be voted out of existence by a very few governors aginst the wishes of parents. It is the law itself that needs to be clear and it certainly isn't at present.

    14 Jul 2010 3:21 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.