You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Reaction to student loans announcement

Students on the University of Kent, Canterbury campus.by Alan McGuinness, journalism student at the University of Kent Medway campus

"Ridiculous!"

That's how one Kent student describes the review, released today by Lord Browne, outlining the biggest reforms of higher education in half a century.

The controversial review recommends removing the limit on tuition fees, currently capped at £3,290 a year.

The government would underwrite fees up to £6,000, paving the way for them to double.

But to soften the blow students would only begin to pay back their loans once they started earning more than £21,000 a year, instead of the existing threshold of £15,000.

On the University of Kent's Medway campus, opinions on the potential rise were divided.

Joe Clemence, 21, said it would not put him off: "If it was £6,000 I'd still apply - it's an investment in the future.

"It's good debt instead of bad debt, that's the way I look at it."What do you think? Join the debate by adding your comments below

However, 21-year-old Leanne Holt thinks it is "ridiculous".

"It would certainly make me think twice about going," she said.

Patrick Nganzi, 19, studies accounting and finance. He said tuition fees were high enough already.

He said: "Raising them would put a lot of people off. I know a lot of people who didn't go because they thought fees at the moment were too high."

Nathan Reynolds, an 18-year-old IT student, said: "It's preposterous that they can raise the fees. I think middle class and lower class students won't be able to apply for university in that case. It will be families that have a wealthier background."

 

Audio: Students speak on Lord Browne's review

Lauren Crowley, vice president of education at Kent University's student union, said students would definitely be deterred from going to university.

She said: "Students may be forced to go to university that's lower down on the league tables because that's all they can afford rather than what their ability dictates.

"I think Lord Browne has failed to actually talk to students and put the personal aspect into the review."

For more on this story, see the blog by the People's Republic of Kent

See our business editor's blog on student loans reform

Tuesday, October 12 2010

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (1)

Comments closed

  • Nick wrote:

    What the students don't realise is that if they get it for 'free', the government will just be borrowing the cash. They are going to be on the hook for the debt, one way or another.

    Now its my opinion that someone on minimum wage shouldn't be paying 2.5K a year in tax. That means about people on the poverty line will be needed to keep just one student going, assuming of course they don't need anything from the government.

    Nope, those who benefit should pay. They should know the cost up front, and not pay some arbitrary amount over 30 years.

    12 Oct 2010 7:57 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.