You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Port boost could see 'thousands of jobs'

Vestas announce jobs boost for Kent

EXCLUSIVE

A massive investment in the Port of Sheerness could see the creation of 2,000 jobs - a move welcomed by business and environment leaders today.

Danish firm Vestas was due to announce Wednesday that it had signed an agreement with Peel Ports to take over 70 hectares of land in the docks.

It aims to build a manufacturing and installation facility for massive offshore wind turbines.

At the time of going to press, details were sketchy but it is understood the project will go ahead if the company receives orders to supply its V164-7.0MW turbines to UK wind farms.

Vestas show how they plan to transform docks

Britain represents the world's largest offshore wind market and Vestas says it is "committed to working with the government and offshore wind stakeholders" to supply turbines.

A spokesman said: "Vestas is prepared to make the necessary, significant investment in turning the option into a full lease and building the planned new production facilities, thereby creating more than 2,000 direct and indirect new jobs - provided the V164-7.0MW order pipeline materialises as expected."

Vestas is the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world and was set to outline its plans at the port on Wednesday morning.

Anders Søe-Jensen, president of Vestas Offshore, said: "We have shown our intentions to make major investments and subsequent job creation, but it is evident that we don't just jump head first into an investment of this size.

Artist impression of how Sheerness Port could look in the future "We need to make sure it makes sense business wise."

It is believed several ports around Britain had been bidding for the facility as it would mean a massive boost to local economies.
Peel Ports was unavailable for comment.

The development comes just two months after Morrisons announced plans to build a superstore at Neats Court, Queenborough, which will create 300 jobs.

Reacting to the news Gordon Henderson MP said he was looking forward to finding out the finer details.

He added that the announcement follows "lots of hard work by lots of people" including himself to attract investment.

He called for the government, KCC and Swale Borough Council to work together to ensure all financial and planning issues are sorted so the development will go ahead.

Swale council's leader Councillor Andrew Bowles welcomed the news.

He said: "We are delighted at the prospect of what this announcement means for Swale and for Sheerness specifically.

"We have been working with SEEDA, Peel Ports and Kent County Council for almost a year and a half to arrive at this point and clearly are very pleased that such a major, industry-leading company has formally announced its firm interest in locating in the borough.

"While due planning processes have to be adhered to, a manufacturing base of such a scale could see the creation of thousands of jobs in the borough.

"Although there is a long way to go, such an announcement is extremely positive news for everyone on the Island and in Swale as a whole."


Read our business editor's view of the plan


Greenpeace UK's executive director John Sauven said: "This is excellent news and shows that there are real jobs and huge opportunities for the UK in renewable energy.

"The government now needs to create the right regulatory framework to build a sustainable green economy.

"This must include removing the blockages to faster take up of renewable energy including giving the green investment bank the ability to borrow money and setting ambitious renewable energy targets beyond 2020."

Peter Symons, director of business development at Locate in Kent said: "It is excellent news for Kent that Danish company Vestas has announced its plan to locate a facility to manufacture wind turbines at Sheerness Port.

"The Vestas plant will build on the county's already excellent credentials - its two existing wind farms and another under construction - London Array - which, once complete will be the world's largest.

"The wind energy industry is a key growth sector for the UK and Locate in Kent has been aware for some time that Kent has a particularly important role to play.

"We've been working in this sector for several years and began speaking to London Array six years ago and Vestas in 2010.

"Vestas' commitment to Kent reflects something we've known for a long time - the county represents an excellent opportunity for the offshore wind industry.

"Its coastline has several ports and harbours with excellent facilities to support both construction and operations and maintenance activities.

"Sheerness Port is part of the Medway Superhub, which offers more than 200ha of development land.

"These sites, along with its position between the North Sea and the Channel, the area's excellent links to London, the rest of the UK and the continent and its long maritime history, make it an ideal location to attract companies across the supply chain."

Tuesday, May 10 2011

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (34)

Comments closed

  • backstreetkid wrote:

    Well we have been told today that the port want us to vacate our building by June 2012. But due to the nature of the buisness. We will proberly be loose are jobs in October.

    17 Jun 2011 6:39 PM

    Report Abuse

  • FC wrote:

    Companies are being given notice to vatcate the port. So that's 3000 jobs to move or be lost completely to make way for an initial 2000 that will surely drop once the building works of the new site has been completed!!! Way to go on decreasing the unemployment numbers!!!!

    17 Jun 2011 12:42 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Jarpot wrote:

    Here is an idea. How about making the Port of Sheerness into a shipping port. This port has been allowed to run into the ground by investment capitalist. As a decent shipping port there would be far more employees. All it needed was some investment but every firm that bought the port just wanted to make a quick bit of cash.

    25 May 2011 9:23 PM

    Report Abuse

  • South African fruit importer wrote:

    Medway Ports made it very clear in there announcement that the port does not intend it's future being one of the largest if not the largest fruit import ports in the UK. All ready it has been announced that Capespan lease is up in 1 year 3 months and will not be renewed. i also hear only from rumour the Banana boat is already looking for a new port to relocate to before there also told there lease will not be renewed.

    17 May 2011 9:04 PM

    Report Abuse

  • backstreetkid wrote:

    Jay its easy for you to say but as an intrested but unaffected person. Some of us work there and are now stuck in limbo waiting to here if our company is going to close or relocate and if it does will it be local or will it be at the other end of the country. All of this and Vesta and peel ports are at the end of the day not sure if this will go ahead or not they still have not got the funding from the goverment yet that they require or the orders for the the wind turbines. There are still a lot thing that have not been finalised. I hope that the company that I work can survive this and move from the docks. Ialso hope I can keep my job because its hard to find a new one at the moment.

    13 May 2011 11:01 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Jay wrote:

    As an interested but (for now) outside party I appreciate the worries and concerns that people have about the future of the dockyard and of course jobs but surely that has been the case for many, many years. Please try to be positive.

    As for the future of the listed properties all will be well.

    There are good and dedicated people working hard to bring what's left back up to standard and restore this unique and historic dockyard to something like it's former self - trust me.

    13 May 2011 10:31 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Reggie wrote:

    Im a bit miffed that none have you have the decency to thank Gordon Henderson for all he is doing for Sheppey !

    12 May 2011 8:08 AM

    Report Abuse

  • john.w wrote:

    I smell a rat somewhere along the line. I've watched the video attached to this piece and it would seem that the whole of the current Sheerness port site will be obliterated !!! If this is correct where is the commercial shipping that now uses Sheerness going to go ?? Have the port authority sold their souls for a few pieces of silver ??? How is is that the firm wanting to take over pulled out of the UK a while ago saying there wasn't enough work ??

    11 May 2011 7:08 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Backstreetkid wrote:

    I notice that nowhere in the video or the report is there a mention of the people who work in the docks now and will proberly loose their jobs if/when this goes ahead. It seems that all the current work force at Sheerness have been forgotton about.

    11 May 2011 6:05 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Suzanne Wood wrote:

    Swale Skills Centre has been focusing on developing young people to service the offshore industry. This opportunity will enable some of those young people, who have very few alternative post-16 education opportunities in the borough, to gain employment. Tony, I thought the reason Vestas closed its IoW op was that they were making product that was only used in USA so they moved production there. I'm looking forward to hearing where we go from here - rather make stuff in UK than just import cars from abroad anyday!

    11 May 2011 5:28 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Old boy wrote:

    @ marc
    Thanks for that. Thats the best afternoon nap ive had in months.

    11 May 2011 4:49 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Bill wrote:

    It will not just be Port staff affected there are other companies at the docks that will have to now up sticks and leave. It will not be possible for all their staff to go with them so they also will loss their jobs
    I agree the papers do just show the positive but just think whilst they complete all this work, poeple will not have their current jobs then and neither will the New positions be filled as yet.
    What will happen in the meantime....more people on jobseekers claiming benefits, well atleast some of these people have actually worked to earn it!!!

    11 May 2011 2:30 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Tractor Owning Lionel wrote:

    Maverick - how utterly insulting to Suffolk and Norfolk.

    11 May 2011 1:46 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Maverick wrote:

    With any luck the turbines might blow Sheerness away from Kent and attach it further up the coast.

    It would fit in a lot better being attached to either Norfolk and Suffolk

    11 May 2011 1:38 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Marc wrote:

    This will be a bad move.
    the "Green Energy" industry is not Sustainable.

    If companies did not get government funding to produce wind turbines, they would not be making them, simply because it is far to expensive and you do not get a return from it. eventually this country will either stop the funding, or go bust. at that stage the 2,000 people will lose their jobs.

    I hope that eventually the government reliase that wind power is not cutting it, and dump the whole idea.

    Here are PRINCIPAL FINDINGS in respect of analysis of electricity generation from all the U.K. windfarms which are metered by National Grid, November 2008 to December 2010. The following five statements are common assertions made by both the wind industry and Government representatives and agencies.

    Average output from wind was 27.18% of metered capacity in 2009, 21.14% in 2010, and 24.08% between November 2008 and December 2010 inclusive.


    There were 124 separate occasions from November 2008 till December 2010 when total generation from the windfarms metered by National Grid was less than 20MW. (Average capacity over the period was in excess of 1600MW).

    The average frequency and duration of a low wind event of 20MW or less between November 2008 and December 2010 was once every 6.38 days for a period of 4.93 hours.

    At each of the four highest peak demands of 2010 wind output was low being respectively 4.72%, 5.51%, 2.59% and 2.51% of capacity at peak demand.

    The entire pumped storage hydro capacity in the UK can provide up to 2788MW for only 5 hours then it drops to 1060MW, and finally runs out of water after 22 hours.

    The future is bright......

    11 May 2011 1:26 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Urall Moronique wrote:

    Ryan - Where on earth do you reach the total of 3000 jobs to go !?!?!?! You are way off the mark so maths degree I very much doubt !!!

    11 May 2011 1:25 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Ryan wrote:

    2000 new jobs created. 3000 employees across numerous companies in the docks. maths degree i have say we are not better off. INTERESTING!!!!! press release like normal only shows the good not the bad!!

    11 May 2011 1:22 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Vent de Lionel wrote:

    What a lot of cold air! Wind farms are ugly, useless and utterly a blot on the environment.

    11 May 2011 1:18 PM

    Report Abuse

  • keith wratten wrote:

    This all sound great, now can someone tell us how we can apply for one of these wonderful 2000 jobs that are heading this way

    11 May 2011 12:51 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Elspeth M wrote:

    AND, where are all the listed buildings in the docks on this play????

    11 May 2011 12:35 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Elspeth Morrison wrote:

    Trust me. This is not good news for the docks. A very sad day and one that Sheppey will regret.

    11 May 2011 12:28 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Jim Naisium wrote:

    The only concern I have is that if these turbines are built in Sheerness, would the town be constantly windy which may mean that my hair would get messy??

    11 May 2011 12:17 PM

    Report Abuse

  • FC wrote:

    The proposed plan in the picture more or less takes over all the existing faclities in the port. Cars, Fruit etc... so where do they and the jobs with them go? Not disputing that 2000 jobs is a good thing but at what cost to other jobs based on the information provided so far?

    11 May 2011 12:15 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Clemence McMaionaise wrote:

    I don’t see where they say the port is going to stop operating to accommodate this development, meaning existing jobs will still be required whilst creating potential employment opportunities. Allot of people commenting on here are missing the point by a large margin!
    Lets hope all other business factors comes together to realise this opportunity for the port & surrounding area.
    To clarify, this will be manufacturing/assembling turbines not dusting them off once a week, so a figure of 2000 jobs is believable!

    11 May 2011 12:05 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Tony Pringle wrote:

    This is great news for Kent, however do not forget that Vestas also had a factory on the Isle of Wight that employed over 500 people and they got made redundant 2 years ago because of poor trade. Today Vestas has also sent out a press release showing a Q1 loss for 2011 of €85 million, this means that they will be looking for a lot of grant and aid money to build this site, they also have to win the orders for turbines from compaies like Vattenfal who build off shore wind farms, Seimens of Germany are also looking to build a similar operation in the North East of England and the question is how many turbines do we need??

    11 May 2011 11:34 AM

    Report Abuse

  • FC wrote:

    All very creating 2000 jobs but what about the current companies and jobs in the port? This picture looks like it flattens everything currently there?

    11 May 2011 11:33 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Port User wrote:

    So basically the 'Port of Sheerness' will no longer be a port and all the people employed in servicing the port will lose their jobs, so how can this new 'factory' be creating 2000 'new jobs'
    Lets hope that Peel Ports spend some of the revenue on restoring the historic part of the Port and maybe open it up to the public.

    11 May 2011 11:32 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Jo wrote:

    is stupid boris going to build his airport now?

    11 May 2011 11:07 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Reggie wrote:

    Neil
    You have to look at the bigger picture. Unlike our previous MP Gordon feins the spotlight and makes comments like that so he dosent appear big headed.He was behind morrisons boost to swale as well but seeked no praise. Also if your going to pick holes in my posts, at least check how Gordon is spelt.

    11 May 2011 10:18 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Neil wrote:

    Reggie, if you read Gorden Hendersons comments correctly: he was lookin forward to finding out the finer details. That means he know nothing of what has gone on.

    11 May 2011 9:51 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Windy Miller wrote:

    Michael, if you read the story correctly, it states it is going to build a manufacturing and installation facility. I would assume by that it will be making the windmills at the port therefore creating jobs, as opposed to the windfarm as the Kent Array is.
    Any jobs being created in Sheppey has got to be a good thing.

    11 May 2011 9:10 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Reggie wrote:

    Great News ! Lets hope this comes to something. Gordon Henderson is certainly earning his crust as an MP ( well for sheppey anyway). Once again thanks Gordon .... That Wyatt bloke done nothing in 5 years and you have achieved so much in 1 year, keep it up !

    11 May 2011 8:40 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Fred Cummins wrote:

    How many jobs will be lost with current business to create this, car industry and fruit etc

    11 May 2011 8:10 AM

    Report Abuse

  • michael wrote:

    2,000 jobs, don't make me laugh, the wind farm off of Thanet seems to have only created 19 full time jobs after similar hype.

    11 May 2011 7:59 AM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.