You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Train collides with car on level crossing near Ramsgate

Video: Insp Ed Walden, of British Transport Police, talks about the incident

Commuters heading home to Ramsgate tonight will be relieved as the train line from London Charing Cross has finally re-opened.

Services have been cancelled all day after a train hit a car on a level crossing, causing major disruption to rail services.

Passengers may still face delays of up to half an hour though between Ramsgate and Canterbury West.

Picture Gallery

  
The vehicle, which had been abandoned at Cliffsend, near Ramsgate, was struck shortly before 5am.

Two people, a man and a woman, both in their 40s, have been held on suspicion of endangering the safety of those on the railway.

They were arrested in Cliffsend this morning.

Audio: Nick Lloyd, from Margate, was travelling on the train when the incident happened

Train crash at Cliffsend, Ramsgate

Nick also took this photo shortly after leaving the train

The train – the 4.50am Ramsgate-London Charing Cross service – was one of the first of the day, with only a handful of passengers on board.

It struck the car – a black Vauxhall Astra – at around 40mph, pushing the vehicle down the tracks.

The train was damaged but did not derail and there are no reports of any injuries to passengers.

The car was empty and British Transport Police (BTP), which attended the crash alongside Kent Fire and Rescue Service and South East Coast Ambulance Service, are now investigating why it was abandoned.

The crash caused major disruption to Southeastern Mainline and High Speed services, with passengers warned to expect disruption for much of the day.

Specialist lifting equipment was used to remove the train. Buses had been replacing trains between Ramsgate and Canterbury West and between Ramsgate and Dover Priory.

A spokesman for Network Rail said the crossing was an automatic half-barrier crossing, and that Foads Lane – which crosses over the railway line – was in full use before the crash.

Wednesday, October 19 2011

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (18)

Comments closed

  • Disgusted of Dymchurch wrote:

    I trust if the culprits are caught and it was deliberate vandalism they will face attempted murder charges, this is a very serious act of vandalism and warrants appropriate charges.

    As to the driver, clearly he averted what could have been a far more serious incident.

    19 Oct 2011 12:25 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Jimmy Reid RIP wrote:

    Due to this mindless piece of idiocy the poor driver had to endure at least several minutes thinking his train may have seriously injured someone or worse.
    They are probably still in a state of shock and deserve nothing but our sympathy and understanding

    19 Oct 2011 12:25 PM

    Report Abuse

  • clare wrote:

    Student: Does the course not include spelling and proof reading? People in glass houses....

    19 Oct 2011 11:58 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Jayser wrote:

    It is ridiculous to blame the driver. Even at slow speeds, it takes quite a distance of track for a train to stop from the moment the brakes are applied. I can't believe ow many people are prepared to come on here and 'give it' to the train company, when they should be chastising the car-stealing idiot who thought this would be funny. As for bridges and underpasses, where do you think this money is going to come from, in a recession?

    19 Oct 2011 11:44 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Student wrote:

    I'm currently doing my NCTJ diploma which includes newswriting. This story is terribly written, it flows like a dried up river and reads like it was written by an eight year old (and then this happened...and then...and then etc.)

    It's not the most boring story, but you male it sound it. If this was in a newswriting exam you would have a big fat fail.

    19 Oct 2011 11:41 AM

    Report Abuse

  • hsdeal.blogspot.com wrote:

    Network Rail have failed to upgrade the Kent Coast Line which still has semaphore signalling and crossings like this one which do not have CCTV installed.

    The line is a mess and needs urgent investment which currently is not due until the end of 2012.

    These incidents and recent signal failures are becoming more frequent and are having a knock on affect to the entire southeastern network.

    @hsdeal

    19 Oct 2011 10:59 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Lack of Investment wrote:

    Why not close the crossing and install a bridge or underpass? Any country that takes its infrstructure seriously would carried out this investment years ago. All level crossings should be phased out.

    19 Oct 2011 10:39 AM

    Report Abuse

  • To Dumbfounded wrote:

    No one is blaimg the driver. Take it as read that Thanet has its fair share of irresponsible anti-social elements among its populace.

    I am sure the driver did his best, but surely flood lighting the crossing, a quick and cheap option, would help a driver in future?

    19 Oct 2011 10:29 AM

    Report Abuse

  • To Simon wrote:

    How the vehicle got there is irrelant to the question of when the driver noticed the danger and started braking.

    19 Oct 2011 10:24 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Dumbfounded wrote:

    Erm why are you all blaming the driver? He managed to not hit the car at a high speed and no-one was hurt. Surely you should all be blaming the idiot that put a BLACK car on the tracks in the NIGHTIME ie dark. How many of you would have seen a black car, that you weren't expecting to be there, in time. The driver wouldnt have seen any reflectors either as it was side on and DARK!

    19 Oct 2011 10:24 AM

    Report Abuse

  • To Dave wrote:

    The eastern approach to Foads Lane level croosing is over a kilometre of straight track.
    For this type of train that would be enough distance in which to stop. The question would be in this case then, at what distance from the crossing did the driver spot the danger and subsequently start braking? Lighting the crossing can only have helped have helped?

    19 Oct 2011 10:05 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Lighting? wrote:

    Both level crossings in the Cliffsend area at Foads Lane and Ebbsfleet lane have long straight approaches from the east. Of couse at this time of year it would have still been dark 5am, which would not have helped the drive. Why not install flood lighting at these level crossings? It would improve safety from every aspect and would be quick and cheap to install.

    Just a thought, no genius needed really!

    19 Oct 2011 9:50 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Dave wrote:

    To Driver

    What was the driver doing? are you on a wind up? do you think driving a train is like driving a car - you cannot stop a train like a car - the train will take an age to stop!!

    Also what would re-signalling this area do, all the re-signalling in the world would not stop vandalism

    19 Oct 2011 9:46 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Resident wrote:

    Apart from the level crossing itself the road leading to it is on a hill. So to stop on the line is either very bad luck or done with intent.

    19 Oct 2011 9:43 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Simon wrote:

    @ Driver,
    Read the article. It was an act of vandalism...ie it was left there on purpose.

    19 Oct 2011 9:34 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Driver? wrote:

    What was the driver doing? Why did he not see it and stop in time? Is the crossing on a blind bend? Or is it straight track and he was just not looking?

    19 Oct 2011 9:27 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Networkfail wrote:

    Network rail please get the Victorian signalling in east Kent upgraded ASAP. That is all.

    19 Oct 2011 9:27 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Nick Lloyd wrote:

    the crash this morning was a lot more 'gentle' than it would have been due to a 40 mph restriction in that area because of works on the line, I was a passenger on the train and the impact was so soft I thought perhaps we had only stopped at a red light at first then the power went out on the train and I relised it was a little more serious.

    19 Oct 2011 8:59 AM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.