You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Chancellor George Osborne in airport meetings with backers

Lord Foster's plans for a hub airport, unveiled last year

Chancellor George Osborne and his officials held a string of private meetings with the backers of plans for a new airport in Kent, including the London Mayor Boris Johnson, it has emerged.

The previously undisclosed contacts stretched over a four-month period between May and August last year, according to details obtained by the KM Group under the Freedom of Information Act.

The government has refused to say why the meetings were held and who asked for them, saying that it is not in the public interest to do so.George Osborne

It did reveal that Mr Osborne held a face-to-face meeting with Boris Johnson in July last year to discuss his plans for an island airport - dubbed Boris Island.

But the Treasury has refused to say exactly what was discussed at the meeting because it involved the formulation of government policy.

The meeting will reinforce speculation that the Treasury and the Chancellor have been instrumental in pushing the government towards backing the highly contentious idea of a new hub airport after David Cameron had, a year earlier, publicly vetoed the prospect.

Those suspicions are underlined by the disclosure that Treasury officials also had regular contacts with Foster and Partners and Halcrow, the backers of an alternative Thames Estuary airport scheme.

Four meetings took place between May and August last year, with Treasury officials being hosted for one of those meetings at the London headquarters of Foster and Partners.

In November, Lord Foster unveiled his company’s vision for a new £50bn international hub airport in Kent, and last month the government announced it was consulting on the idea as part of a review of aviation capacity.

But it seems the Treasury was actively involved in listening to the case for an airport several months before. The first meeting officials had with representatives of Fosters and Partners was held in May, followed by a second just a month later.

Paul Francis blog button

After the first meeting, Foster and Partners sent an email which said: "We found the conversation we had both stimulating and highly reassuring as you both made points we passionately believe in."

This meeting was followed by two more in July and August, this time involving both Foster and Partners and Halcrow, infrastructure consultants working on the scheme.

The government has refused to release any information about what was discussed at any of these meetings.

Lord Foster, architectIn its response to our FOI request, the Treasury confirmed "the issue of an Estuary airport was covered to an extent" but said there were "weighty arguments" for withholding the information.

The response said: "There is a strong public interest in effective policy development.

"If ministers and officials were not able to conduct a free and frank discussion it would result in in people providing less candid opinions and therefore impact on the quality of policy development.

"We do not think this would be in the public interest, particularly as this is currently a very live issue."

Wednesday, February 08 2012

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (6)

Post a Comment

  • miss wrote:

    Ultimately I guess if we don't act soon, European international rail and flight operators will

    be able to combine services to compete for business on international fares, but this would be a

    huge inconvenience for the traveler, as travelers would need to exchange currency and additional
    strict
    passport checks at check-in desks in Europe, however this new trend could hit the south east region by 2014,

    before the new airport can be built. We need to discuss these issues now and the local public should be more concerned about the future of travel and jobs as UK airports are loosing business with air operators each year, yet the demand for flights is increasing. In fact in the South east we take international flight very seriously as we occupy the most airline seats in the entire country, while CDG in Paris City center was recently expanded. In example a simple comparison getting the train to France then flying:

    - AA ECONOMY £233 CDG (Paris) to MIA/MCO (Miami/Orlando)

    - AA ECONOMY £283 LHR (London) to MIA/MCO (Miami/Orlando)

    If you have children to cater, you cannot afford to all get in one taxi, lots of luggage and very expensive. Driving can cost you in traffic and car parking so then your loyalties rely on pricing.

    Trains to France start from around £45 return on the Euro tunnel train so if you are anywhere around Canterbury, Dover, Folkstone, Ashford, Maidstone, Sevenoaks or Medway. In fact there are now passenger stations all the way up to London and they have tickets starting from as little as £63 return.

    Do the math immigration and tourism are not the same! Are about to kill tourism for others and ourselves?

    11 Feb 2012 5:58 PM

    Report Abuse

  • DannyPat wrote:

    Indeed...shuffle off Rodney Chambers and take your other short-sighted sheep with you...retire now!

    Hear's to Reading gaining City status...one in the eye for Rodders...who has little sight, vision or listening ability anyway!

    10 Feb 2012 9:04 PM

    Report Abuse

  • jaybee wrote:

    Rodders.....you are just not in the same league as Boris....you have no ambition or creative thinkers at Medway Council.....just give it up and retire

    10 Feb 2012 5:28 PM

    Report Abuse

  • non wrote:

    why am i not surprised, tories are slimey. We will have the airport, we will have medway crappy status whether we want it or not.
    disgusting sneaking around by millionaire tory boys who so far out of touch its unreal.

    Public are stupid to read and believe there lies and throwing out distractions to take you away from what they are actually upto.

    10 Feb 2012 3:46 PM

    Report Abuse

  • tris wrote:


    No surprises that the Tories are being two-faced on the airport. I dont think the public will be shocked by this news at all.

    Tories on the Peninsula have a choice; pay your subs to a party that wants to bulldoze your home or resign and stand up for your community.

    The more concerning fact is that despite open letters from Council leaders and MPs they all to appear to have been utterly ignored by Tory ministers.

    It is the Conservative-party arrogance on this issue which is so destructive. The fact they are ignoring any representation shows how much of a Bullingdon, out-of-touch, elite they really are.

    10 Feb 2012 11:40 AM

    Report Abuse

  • DannyPat wrote:

    So, these government meetings have the same hallmarks of 'behind closed doors' meetings held by Medway Council, e.g. Chatham Bus-Station.

    10 Feb 2012 8:50 AM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.