You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Border Agency to be split in two

Eurostar train

by Martin Jefferies

As many as half-a-million people entered the UK through Kent without being checked against a list of suspected terrorists and criminals, it has been revealed.

Vital security checks against the Home Office Warnings Index - a database of people banned from entering the country - were not completed on around 500,000 Eurostar passengers since 2007.

The same checks were suspended at Calais and Coquelles more than 130 times. On one occasion, they were relaxed for more than six hours.

The figures were revealed as the Home Secretary said the UK Border Agency needs a "whole new management culture".

Theresa May addressed parliament following a report published today into the relaxation of security.

The investigation was carried out by John Vine, the independent chief inspector of the UK Border Agency .

He found Eurostar passengers from within the EU who travelled to the UK on trains from Disneyland Paris and seasonal services from Avignon and Bourg-Saint-Maurice were not routinely checked.

Only those fitting a "targeted profile" and passengers from outside the EU were checked against the Warnings Index. Mr Vine said that was of "considerable concern".

What do you think? Join the debate by adding your comments belowThe checks at Calais and Coquelles - immigration checks are carried out before passengers arrive in the UK - were suspended to prevent emergencies, overcrowding or to ease congestion on roads leading to the ports.

Mr Vine said there was "a lack of effective management oversight of the frequency with which checks had been suspended, the reasons for this and which ports were suspending checks".

"Had this been in place, it would have enabled the UK Border Agency to reduce the number of suspensions of these important checks," he added.

In Ms May's speech to MPs yesterday, she said there needs to be a new set of guidelines for border control, detailing the minimum level of mandatory checks.

She announced the UK Border Force will be split from the Border Agency and become accountable to ministers.

She also said that UK border controls have been inconsistently policed for at least the last five years, adding that border staff went "over and beyond" any scheme approved by ministers to relax checks.

Tuesday, February 21 2012

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (20)

Post a Comment

  • sgge888 wrote:

    Dont blame the guys working on the fence...I have a friend who works in the Agency and he has told me of the systematic removal of pay & conditions, being bullied into signing lesser contracts. All the while the people at the top get more. These greedy fat cats are the ones harming our borders and are never held to account. How are the men and women patrolling the berths in Dunkirk at below zero temperatures at 2am supposed to be motivated when this is going on all around them. Labour and Tory yet again you have made the bed in which we have to lie.

    23 Feb 2012 8:26 AM

    Report Abuse

  • John wrote:

    Twink: I can understand what you are sating in your most recent post and I wholly accept your comments about the effects of cuts and job losses on morale and quality of work - I have, in the past, worked in an organisation suffering cuts, job losses and pay freezes.

    What I was questioning was the bit about Labour borrowing endless amounts of money to make the agency work.

    Bob F: I would prefer to see your solution to the problems of people abusing the benefits of living in the UK rather than tightening border controls. The main difficulty is, as always, the cost - yes, money would be saved in the long run but checking on people's entitlement to services would need more staff in the short term. Unfortunately, governments (of any colour) are too ready to cut back on staff that actually do useful work in difficult economic times.

    22 Feb 2012 10:37 PM

    Report Abuse

  • twink wrote:

    John..in late 2010 Theresa May announced a 20% cut in the UK Border Agency budget ....like many public sector departments the current government want them to produce the same results with less staff.If you have ever worked in a department where people are losing their jobs you will know what effect it has on moral and quality of work.

    22 Feb 2012 10:53 AM

    Report Abuse

  • M wrote:

    It does not matter which party you vote for. At the end of the day the Border Control dept has not done its job. It needs fixing - now.

    22 Feb 2012 10:45 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Bob Down wrote:

    @ ex old bill Im a labour voter, another failing in your observation skills.

    @ angry mum, your spelling is below the average of an immigrant, shame on you !

    22 Feb 2012 8:57 AM

    Report Abuse

  • Angry Mum wrote:

    What a joke, goverment should of done more. Its not just the terrarists but more immagrant's taking the job's. Shame on them

    22 Feb 2012 8:06 AM

    Report Abuse

  • bob f wrote:

    The only solution is to refuse housing, health, education, National Insurance numbers, Social Security etc to all who have not got proof of lawful residence. Unfortunately most of those employed by these 'service providers' would be up in arms if asked to enforce such a policy. When I worked in Immigration Enforcement back in the eighties the best guestimate was that there were at least 200,000 nickable people in London (workers in breach of conditions, overstayers, illegals). The figures now are much higher. Even then the situation was so far out of control that it was not unusual to do a check with the local Police Collator to find that the punter you were about to detain, who had no right to be in the UK, was on the Electoral Roll. In my personal experience no government in the past 40 years has addressed the problem seriously.


    22 Feb 2012 12:14 AM

    Report Abuse

  • John wrote:

    Twink, can you explain / justify your comment that, "The current agency was designed by a Labour government who were going to borrow endless amounts of money to make it succeed."? I accept the current agency was designed by a Labour government but do not understand the comment about endless amounts of money - perhaps you could enlighten us?

    21 Feb 2012 11:51 PM

    Report Abuse

  • John wrote:

    In his first comment, M states that it is "time for identity cards and mandatory DNA profiles" as well strict border control. I assume that he wants this to prevent terrorists getting into the country or is it, perhaps, just to keep "foreigners" out? If we have to go to these lengths to control terrorists then the terrorists have won as they will have turned a free and liberal UK into a police state.

    Tommy Atkins seems worried that, even today, you can travel between France and Belgium without producing a passport. What surprises me is that, even today, you can travel right across Europe and only have to produce a passport to get into and out of the UK. This ability to travel freely doesn’t seem to harm the countries which are part of the Schengen agreement.

    To those who would argue for strict passport controls to reduce terrorism I would point out two things. One, those European countries which allow free movement between themselves and other such countries do not have any greater terrorism problem than us. Two, the majority of terrorists are "home-grown" not "imported".

    21 Feb 2012 11:45 PM

    Report Abuse

  • bob f wrote:

    Interestingly in the past four years almost 60 UK Border Agency workers committed offences relating to their job.

    In the latest scandal to hit the agency, figures revealed that ten staff members were found to have protected illegal immigrants since 2008.

    Another 39 staff had been disciplined for abuse of position in relation to immigration misconduct and a further eight cited for organised activity.

    This is what happens when the Home Office hires staff to celebrate our multi cultural diversity rather than to do the job!

    21 Feb 2012 11:31 PM

    Report Abuse

  • tommy atkins wrote:

    This is nothing new. Even today, you don't need a passport to travel between Belgium and France on the Eurostar.You are permitted passport free access between the two countries. You then simply stay on the train until you arrive in the UK.The Government have been aware of this for years, yet seem unable to stop it.

    21 Feb 2012 8:57 PM

    Report Abuse

  • twink wrote:

    I would rather judge Theresa May when we see the results of the changes she is making to the Border agency. The current agency was designed by a Labour government who were going to borrow endless amounts of money to make it succeed. Now the debts have to be paid back (reality shock) the system needs streamlining.

    21 Feb 2012 8:18 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Ex Old Bill wrote:

    @Bob Down
    Don't worry Bob about my observation skills, I suspect the real reason you are having a poke at me is you are a Tory who is embarrassed about voting for Tories and seeing what a mess they are making of things. The FACTS are that the Home Secretary is a Tory and most of those who sit around the cabinet table are Tories who are being kept in government by default with the help the lap-dogs Lib-Dems.

    21 Feb 2012 5:40 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Bob Down wrote:

    Once again ex old bill is showing why he is not a serving officer but EX ! We have a coalition government not a tory one. How many people have you falsely arrested in the past because of your extreemly poor observation skills ?

    21 Feb 2012 5:16 PM

    Report Abuse

  • M wrote:

    I guess Ms T May the Home Secretary would never have known. The border control realised the bad job they had and were doing and would not have informed the minister of the problem. I guess as minister or head of the UK Border Control she should have known but if the information was kept from her then she would not have been able to get it fixed. Having said that she is responsible for the department actions since she was appointed as Home Secretary. Don't think she should lose her job over this as the problem started with the last government.

    21 Feb 2012 4:03 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Norsewind wrote:

    Well ex Old bill, read the article again and look at the bit where it says "inconsistently policed for at least the last 5 YEARS" ... so it has been like this since the Labour lot split H.M.Customs up into what we have now...

    however makes you wonder why Ms May did not pick up on this sooner

    21 Feb 2012 3:12 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Ex Old Bill wrote:

    Sure sign Twink is a Torie. Labour may well have done what they done. However the Tories are now in power with a useless Home Secretary she should carry the can for the failings of the NO boarder mob. We have enough criminals and terrorist in the UK as it is without letting more in through sheer incompetence.

    21 Feb 2012 3:01 PM

    Report Abuse

  • twink wrote:

    We have been on the slippery slope to this since the Labour government replaced HM Customs with the dressed down casual looking Border agency.

    21 Feb 2012 1:19 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Ex Old Bill wrote:

    When the ship hit the rocks in Italy the captain was blamed. In the this case Home Secretary Mrs May who is in charge of our boarders blames everybody else, she should be sacked for incompetence.

    21 Feb 2012 12:46 PM

    Report Abuse

  • M wrote:

    Wonderful - so we don't have a clue who we have in this country now? Who is to blame?Time for identity cards and mandatory DNA profiles on everyone and strict border control. Try getting into the USA without the correct paperwork.

    21 Feb 2012 12:30 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.