You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

MP Mark Reckless hits out at 'toxic' policy

The government has been urged to re-think its plans to cut child benefit by Kent MP Mark Reckless, who has warned it has become a ‘toxic’ policy.

The Rochester and Strood MP said the plan to withdraw benefit from households in which one or more taxpayers earn more than £45,000 was unfair and one he would find it difficult to support.

Writing in his blog, Mr Reckless warned the government was ‘toxic’ and that ‘a very significant number of Conservative backbenchers’ were sufficiently concerned that they were likely to vote against the policy.

He said: "Ministers cannot answer colleagues who question them about the sheer unfairness of one family with a single earner on £45,000 losing their child benefit, while a family with two earners, each earning around £40,000, get to keep their child benefit.

"Certainly, I don’t feel that I am currently able to give constituents a satisfactory answer as to how this is fair, particularly when we continue to pay child benefit to many thousands of children in EU countries such as Poland and Lithuania, where costs are much lower, even when they have never set foot in the UK."

The issue was ‘particularly toxic’ for MPs who were keen to see the Conservatives promote marriage and traditional family values, he added. "However, the policy is also objectionable for those who want the tax system to be neutral between personal choices, since it clobbers single earner householders, most usually with a stay-at-home Mum, relative to dual-earner couples."

The benefit is worth £20.30 a week for the first child and £13.40 each for every sibling. Under the government’s plans, as many as 1.8m families where a parent earns more than £42,725 would lose out.

Mr Reckless said he would find it hard to support the changes as they stood, principally because of their unfairness and that many backbenchers shared his reservations.

The Prime Minister has indicated the policy may be re-examined but to date, no official steps have been made to change the proposals.

Wednesday, February 22 2012

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

  • Zedboy wrote:

    Daft and expensive to administer.... Just cap child benefit for first two kids. Easy to implement and will stop he chavs breeding for a living

    22 Feb 2012 10:35 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Ex Old Bill wrote:

    "particularly when we continue to pay child benefit to many thousands of children in EU countries such as Poland and Lithuania, where costs are much lower, even when they have never set foot in the UK." How in a million years can the above be allowed to happen???? When only yesterday a think-tank said bus passes should be taken off UK OAPs. Scandalous or what.

    22 Feb 2012 3:16 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.