You are not currently logged in.
Thursday, May 24 2012

Lorry driver jailed for killing dad-of-two in head-on crash

The scene of the crash in Snave, Romney Marsh. Picture: Peter Stretton Kent Skywatch Civil Air Patrol.

The scene of the crash in Snave, Romney Marsh. Picture: Peter Stretton, Kent Skywatch Civil Air Patrol.

by Paul Hooper

A lorry driver who killed an Ashford dad-of-two in a head-on crash has told a court: "I am sorry beyond words... and I will die sorry."

Clifford Sparks, 52, wept as a judge heard he had been speeding along the A2070, at Snave, on Romney Marsh, in March 2010.

When a lorry he was following too closely braked hard, Mr Sparks swerved into the path of an oncoming car - driven by father-of-two Spencer Williams, 42, from Ashford.

Mr Williams, whose widow was in court for the hearing, died from his injuries.

Sparks, of Vickers Lane, Dartford, initially denied causing death by driving carelessly - but changed his plea after being cross-examined during his trial last November.

The offence carries a maximum five-year jail sentence - but Judge Simon James heard Sparks was carrying "a burden which is almost unbearable" and the death has had "a crushing effect" on him.

He has now been jailed for 18 months and banned from driving for two years.

Christopher May, prosecuting, told Canterbury Crown Court Sparks had been following an articulated lorry along the road from Brenzett to Ashford, which has a 40mph restriction for lorries.

He said the driver of the first lorry was heading for a farm and missed his first turning - and braked hard.

The court heard Sparks was too close and swerved to avoid hitting the lorry and into the path of Mr Williams' oncoming Renault.

"Mr Williams had been driving in a perfectly ordinary manner, within the speed limit, and had done nothing wrong," said Mr May.

"You are a decent and responsible person who has suffered considerable punishment - and will regret it for the rest of his life…” – Judge Simon James

Luke Blackburn, defending, said it was only after Sparks had been cross-examined during his trial did "it dawn on him that he must have been driving too close".

He added: "He has shown an exceptional level of remorse and anger at himself.

"He just could not at first bring himself to deal with what he has done - he just couldn't bring himself to see it.

"He is a decent and honest man and is well regarded by his family, friends and work colleagues.

"He has shown quite exceptional remorse - not just today, for the rest of his life. He is sorry beyond words and he will die sorry."

The judge said the Williams family had "lost its heart" and no sentence he could impose "could be considered adequate for such a loss".

Judge James said he accepted Sparks' remorse was genuine and he had suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression after the fatal crash.

He sad: "You are a decent and responsible person who has suffered considerable punishment - and will regret it for the rest of his life.

"But that is a luxury that will never be afforded Mr Williams and his innocent family who has now lost its heart."

A driver of another lorry was acquitted at another trial of causing death by careless driving.

Tuesday, February 28 2012

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Comments (8)

Post a Comment

  • jbqueen wrote:

    And at the risk of sounding pedantic, there is nothing in the Highway Code about mirror, signal, manoeuvre when it comes to breaking. It is all about not following too closely. Sorry, but the driver at the front has nothing to feel bad about.

    05 Mar 2012 12:08 PM

    Report Abuse

  • jbqueen wrote:

    Molly I agree, but the onus is still on the person following to not follow too closely for that very reason. This time the driver missed a turn and braked sharply but by your reasoning, if a child ran out in front of him should he worry more about that or what is happening behind him? The only lesson to be learned from this tragedy is, don't follow too closely. That is in the highway code too.

    05 Mar 2012 9:31 AM

    Report Abuse

  • sjb wrote:

    total bullshit,hes only sorry after the event,too many drivers like him on that(and many more) stretch of road,they use it regularly and think "gotta get past the lorry" and take totally irrisponsible actions with no regard for anyone but themselves,not the first death there and wont be the last unfortunately.should have got at least 5 years and banned for life!I deal with at least 20-30 people like him everyday on the road and one day one of them will end up under 30 tonne of truck and theyll try n blame the lorry! hope poor unfortunate man who payed for his mistake haunts him forever,at least one less idiot on our roads for next 2 years!

    02 Mar 2012 11:39 PM

    Report Abuse

  • molly wrote:

    JBQueen, it states in the article that the lorry in front missed a turning so slammed on his brakes. Slamming on your brakes with no warning is dangerous - Highway code, Mirror, Signal, Manoeuvre.

    The only time this classed excuseable is if someone pulled out or stepped out in front of you.

    In insurance terms if you even did it because a cat walked out in front of you and someone went into the back of you, you would be held liable so why has the full onus gone on one driver in these circumstances?

    02 Mar 2012 2:03 PM

    Report Abuse

  • jbqueen wrote:

    Molly, you cannot blame the driver in front, he has no cotrol over what happens behind him. You have no idea what might've made him brake. The responsiblity is on the person following. Sometimes accidents do just happen but you can try and minimise the risks. It's too late to be sorry after the event yet people continue to take risks and put others in danger.

    02 Mar 2012 12:07 PM

    Report Abuse

  • molly wrote:

    You could sentance him to 18mths or 18years it won't change what happened, won't make him regret his actions any more and won't bring the man back to life.

    Just because he made a mistake doesn't make him a bad person, everyone makes mistakes, some people are lucky that those mistakes result in barely any consequence if anything at all. For others it can result in life shattering consequences.

    It was small mistake, plus an unfortunate set of events, the lorry in the front should've been aware that the lorry behind was too close and shouldn't have suddenly braked for really no good reason, he should also have been held responsible for the events.

    The only innocent party is the victim. There is no winner.

    01 Mar 2012 8:18 PM

    Report Abuse

  • Zedboy wrote:

    It's dreadfully sad, but it wasn't a will fully malicious act. He made a mistake... Albeit one with tragic circumstances and everyone 'lost'.

    28 Feb 2012 9:57 PM

    Report Abuse

  • wire wrote:

    How can the judge call him decent and responsible? Speeding and driving too close to the vehicle in front are not the actions of a 'decent and responsible' person! It appears that to kill someone with a vehicle carries only a light 18 month sentence.
    I have no sympathy that for him the main sentence is to live with the consequences of his actions. The sentecne handed out to the victims family will not be over in 18 months.
    RIP Spence your missed daily.

    28 Feb 2012 7:13 PM

    Report Abuse

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227834.

Advertisement

Copyright: You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit or otherwise use content on this site in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any content on this site except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of content requires the prior written permission of the KM GROUP. Read full terms and conditions.