Share

Clear

Wed

18°C | 6°C

Clear spells

Thu

19°C | 10°C

Clear spells

Fri

19°C | 8°C

Home   Thanet   News   Article

Judge James O'Mahony slams Crown Prosecution Service in Ramsgate biting case of James Holland after Fifa bans Uruguay footballer Luis Suarez ban

27 June 2014
by Paul Hooper

Fifa is treating offences of biting seriously - but not so Kent's Crown Prosecution Service, according to a judge.

Yesterday, football's world ruling body handed a four-month ban to Uruguay's Luis Suarez for digging his teeth into an opponent in a World Cup game against Italy.

But when violent James Holland - from Ramsgate - did the same to two police officers, lawyers let him plead to the minor charge of common assault.

Uruguay’s Luis Suarez was given a four-month ban for biting

Uruguay’s Luis Suarez was given a four-month ban for biting

Today Judge James O'Mahony criticised what he called an "extraordinary decision" not to proceed with more serious assault charges.

He told Canterbury Crown Court: "If you bite someone, you cause an injury. When he was arrested, he caused a very nasty assault by biting a police officer.

"It is tempting to make reference to what is going on in the World Cup, but if you bite someone that's causing them actual bodily harm."

Holland, 28, of Mount Zion House, Camden Road, had admitted assaulting police officers Simon Barnes, Stuart Long and Ian Vanstone.

One officer was bitten in the hand and the second on his finger in November last year. He will be sentenced in two weeks, together with another common assault and causing criminal damage.

The judge said the crown "would have had absolutely no difficulty" in proving the more serious assaults causing actual bodily harm.

"The wisdom behind accepting a plea to common assault is simply beyond me," he said.

Judge James O'Mahony criticised the Crown Prosecution Service

Judge James O'Mahony criticised the Crown Prosecution Service

A charge of inflicting grievous bodily harm to Holland's ex-lover Catherine Curtis was reduced to an assault causing actual bodily harm on the day of his trial. He had pleaded not guilty.

But after hearing legal submissions, Judge O'Mahony ordered the jury to acquit Holland.

He then criticised the crown's preparation of the case and for failing to get medical evidence about an alleged to fracture of Ms Curtis' foot.

The judge added that all cases of alleged domestic assault should be treated seriously, but CPS lawyers should have assessed the strength of the prosecution case prior to trial.

That, he added, would have shown up the "flaws in the case".

Holland – who has been in custody for seven months – was given bail until the next hearing.

Click here for more news from Thanet.

Click here for more news from around the county.

Comments 

Forgotten Password?

Forgotten Username?

Don't have an account? Please Register first!

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227989.