Home   Folkestone   News   Article

Home Secretary Priti Patel and Immigration Minister Chris Philp defend use of Napier Barracks to hold asylum seekers


More news, no ads

LEARN MORE

Ministers have fended off criticism from MPs over housing asylum seekers at Napier Barracks, insisting it is safe, secure and is better value than hotels - and failing to clarify how long it will be used.

Minister Chris Philp was put on the spot in the Commons today in the wake of a serious fire at the Folkestone site a fortnight ago.

Folkestone MP Damian Collins questioned Immigration Minister Chris Philp

Activists take radical action at Napier Barracks to highlight perceived human rights violations Picture: Andrew Aitchison/Getty Images
Activists take radical action at Napier Barracks to highlight perceived human rights violations Picture: Andrew Aitchison/Getty Images

It has been the scene of many protests, both inside and out, over the past months regarding conditions, an issue brought into sharp focus recently when more than 100 people being held their contracted coronavirus.

Kent MPs attacked the government’s use of the former barracks while Labour accused the government of a moral and public health disaster.

Folkestone and Hythe MP Damian Collins has been vocal in his opposition to the use of the barracks site.

He said in the Commons the barracks were not suitable to house asylum seekers for a “prolonged period of time” and sought assurances that their use would be temporary.

“We should avoid using facilities like this in the future,” he added.

The fire at Napier Barracks
The fire at Napier Barracks
Damian Collins
Damian Collins

Replying, minister Chris Philp said the barracks had been used to cope with the “enormous pressures” in the asylum system caused partly by the coronavirus pandemic.

He said: “We have set it up in a way in which it is safe; it is of course accommodation that was previously used by the brave men and women of the armed services. It is not intended to be used in perpetuity.”

But he sidestepped the question about how long the government intended to use the barracks site, suggesting that it was cheaper than using hotels.

He added: “All of us owe a duty to the taxpayer to ensure value for money and we make no excuse for that.”

Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield challenged the government over the widespread concern expressed by many organisations that the accommodation was not suitable.

Asylum seekers protesting at Napier Barracks over the living conditions. Picture: Care4Calais
Asylum seekers protesting at Napier Barracks over the living conditions. Picture: Care4Calais

Listing those who have led calls for the government to scrap using the barracks site, she said: “Does the minister disagree with all those organisations that I have mentioned and believe that they have done an adequate job in providing safe and suitable accommodation for asylum seekers who have in many cases fled war, torture and persecution?”

She also claimed the contractor running the barracks was in line to make £1 billion from its work for the government.

Home Secretary Priti Patel. Picture: Home Office
Home Secretary Priti Patel. Picture: Home Office

Home Secretary Priti Patel said the barracks was safe.

“We are working to ensure that it is safe; it absolutely is. And it is Covid compliant, which it is,” she added.

Fourteen men were arrested following the blaze.

Recently two court orders have been passed requiring the government to urgently move asylum seekers at the barracks over concerns about the conditions.

Head to our politics page for expert analysis and all the latest news from your politicians and councils.

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More