Home   Sheerness   News   Article

Legal threat after decision to exclude Medway Maritime Hospital from becoming hyper acute stroke unit

A group of MPs have threatened a legal challenge over health bosses’ decision to exclude Medway Maritime Hospital from becoming one of Kent’s new hyper acute stroke units.

Sheppey and Sittingbourne MP Gordon Henderson, Rochester and Strood MP Kelly Tolhurst and Gillingham and Rainham Rehman Chishti have joined forces to lobby Health Minister Matthew Hancock.

The three have also sent a strongly-worded letter to Ian Ayres, managing director of Medway, North and West Kent Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) who plan and pay for the bulk of the healthcare in Kent.

Medway Martime Hospital. Picture: Google Street View
Medway Martime Hospital. Picture: Google Street View

The recommendation was made by a joint committee of 10 CCGs whose patients use urgent stroke services in Kent and Medway. They comprise the eight CCGs covering Kent and Medway plus the Bexley and High Weald Lewes Havens CCGs.

That committee will make the final decision.

Mr Henderson said: “Given the impact this decision will have on the half-million people who use Medway hospital, we see no other option but to seek legal opinion on lodging a judicial review.”

The MPs’ decision follows a meeting with Mr Ayres last month when the trio insisted Medway should be one of the three sites.

Mr Henderson said: “The decision to exclude Medway appears to neglect where there is greater need and deprivation.

"Medway is the fastest growing urban area in the south east outside London but it suffers from significant deprivation and health inequalities.

Gordon Henderson MP
Gordon Henderson MP
Kelly Tolhurst MP and Rehman Chishti MP
Kelly Tolhurst MP and Rehman Chishti MP

"The same applies to Sittingbourne and Sheppey.

"Those living on the Isle of Sheppey face a hugely difficult journey to reach Maidstone Hospital which is almost impossible to reach by public transport.”

He added: “There was little transparency and there is still no detailed, analytical document explaining how the outcome was reached.

"The anonymous voting method used was highly flawed as basic facts miss out on important nuances within communities such as Medway, Sittingbourne and Sheppey.

"We have lost confidence in the ability to deliver a realistic and workable health service for residents.”

"The decision to exclude Medway appears to neglect where there is greater need and deprivation" - Sheppey and Sittingbourne MP Gordon Henderson

Rachel Jones, director for the Kent and Medway Stroke Review who also works for Swale and Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley CCGs, said: “We absolutely respect the role of MPs in representing their constituents.

"But we have a responsibility to consider the health and wellbeing of the entire population who use Kent and Medway stroke services.

"We have carefully considered population growth, deprivation and travel times to potential hyper acute stroke units and believe the rigorous process we are following and the proposals we have made will best meet the needs of our whole population.”

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More