KentOnline

bannermobile

News

Sport

Business

What's On

Advertise

Contact

Other KM sites

CORONAVIRUS WATCH KMTV LIVE SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTERS LISTEN TO OUR PODCASTS LISTEN TO KMFM
SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE
Sport

Kent (164 & 149) lost to Essex (573) by an innings and 260 runs in County Championship at Canterbury

By: KentOnline reporter multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk

Published: 14:37, 08 September 2022

Updated: 14:51, 08 September 2022

Kent's resistance on the final day of their LV= Insurance County Championship Division 1 match with Essex lasted less than five overs on Thursday.

Torrential rain delayed the start until 12.38pm but Kent's fate was quickly sealed as Essex took the two remaining wickets needed to secure a comprehensive win.

Kent's Matt Milnes - was the first wicket to fall on day four against Essex. Picture: Keith Gillard

Kent resumed on 137-8. In reality, with Matt Milnes’ mobility drastically reduced due to a stress fracture in his back, Kent’s only hope of escaping with a draw was to bat for as long as possible and hope the rain returned.

Milnes, in what was his final act as a Kent player before he moves to Yorkshire next season, lasted three overs before getting a bottom edge to Sam Cook that was taken by a tumbling Nick Browne.

It meant Cook returned second innings figures of 7-33, and 10-60 in the match.

mpu1

Although dark clouds were hovering, the rain stayed away and the victory was sealed when Jordan Cox (65) edged Jamie Porter (3-50) and fell to a juggling catch by Matt Critchley in the slips, leaving Kent 149 all out.

Kent took just one point from the contest and have edged closer to the relegation zone, with two matches left to play at the end of this month, against Hampshire and Somerset.

Kent head coach Matt Walker said: “I don’t think we deserved the rain to save us really, we haven’t played well enough over three days and if you’re hoping for rain to save you, you know you’re in a pretty tough spot.

"We fought hard last night to try and drag it out till today where we knew the forecast was a bit indifferent, but we didn’t deserve to get anything out of this game.

“The numbers are pretty stark. It was a good cricket wicket, there was a bit in it, it was a good toss to win and we didn’t make the most of those conditions early on.

"It wasn’t a terrible first session but we didn’t challenge them enough and they just showed us how to go about it and how to bowl on this wicket. It almost at times looked as if it was two different surfaces and that’s what happens when you do your basics well enough.

mpu2

“Their ability to bowl the ball in the right areas over and over again caused us a huge amount of problems and we didn’t deal with it well enough, so it’s not just the bowlers.

"It showed what you can do on what was a pretty good cricket wicket. It certainly wasn’t a 573 wicket and it wasn’t a 164 wicket. It was somewhere in between.

“It didn’t help losing Nathan Gilchrist on the morning of the game and then obviously Matt Milnes and Sam Billings who are certainly unlikely for the next game. As far as overseas players go, we could do with a body in the camp for the next game, but apart from that, everybody is available and we’ll have a big think after the Royal London final about what we need to do."

More by this author

sticky

© KM Group - 2024