KentOnline

bannermobile

News

Sport

Business

What's On

Advertise

Contact

Other KM sites

CORONAVIRUS WATCH KMTV LIVE SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTERS LISTEN TO OUR PODCASTS LISTEN TO KMFM
SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE
News

Headcorn magistrate to sue for religious discrimination after being struck off for view on same sex adoption

By: Claire McWethy cmcwethy@thekmgroup.co.uk

Published: 09:00, 13 March 2016

Updated: 09:32, 13 March 2016

A magistrate struck off for his views on same sex adoption is to take legal action over the decision.

Richard Page was reprimanded last year after questioning whether a same-sex couple would be the best choice of parents during an adoption case.

The 69-year-old Christian, from Headcorn, said it was natural and in the interests of a child to be brought up by a mother and father.

Richard Page, from Headcorn, lost his role as an NHS director

But after being struck off this week he now intends to take his case to an employment tribunal, saying he has been discriminated against for his religious beliefs.

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office sent Mr Page on an equality course following the comments, which were made in an interview on national television last year.

mpu1

But on Wednesday he was told he would not be returning to the bench.

A spokesman for the JCIO said: “The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice found Mr Page’s comments would have caused a reasonable person to conclude he was biased and prejudiced against single sex adopters; they considered this to be serious misconduct which brought the magistracy into disrepute."

Environment Secretary Michael Gove

Andrea Williams, the chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, who is supporting Mr Page said that papers were being prepared to be served on Mr Page's behalf.

She said: "We are doing this because the two highest lawyers in our country (The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice) have said that Richard Page was biased and prejudiced.

"This Christian magistrate spent all his life serving society and by acting on his belief that vulnerable children need a mum and dad, to sack him is prejudicial.

"It is a very sad state of affairs in modern Britain. This legal action is a matter of principle."

More by this author

sticky

© KM Group - 2024