Moderate showers


17°C | 8°C

Light rain


13°C | 6°C

Light rain


14°C | 8°C

Home   Deal   News   Article

Dover thief Jay Bates facing jail after child’s TV stays missing as he breaks deal with Judge Nigel Van Der Bijl at Canterbury Crown Court

09 January 2014
by Paul Hooper

A Dover thief who welched on a deal with a judge to return a child's stolen TV is finally behind bars.

Jay Bates, 20, had been facing a two-month home curfew when he offered to hand back the television to the distraught 10-year-old.

His pledge from the dock at Canterbury Crown Court led to the suspension of the judge's order for a month.

Burglar Jay Bates stole a 32-inch television

Burglar Jay Bates stole a 32-inch television

But the equipment was never returned and Bates, of Glenfield Road, twice failed to show up for hearings to explain why.

Now Judge Nigel Van Der Bijl has been told the thief could not make the last court hearing – because he was in another court on yet one more burglary charge.

Bates, who had been given a 12-month suspended jail sentence for the earlier raid, is expected to plead guilty and has been remanded in custody.

"The restoration of stolen property can sometimes help victims... but that doesn't seem to have happened here..." - Judge Nigel Van Der Bijl

And that would trigger the "three-strike" sentencing rule, which means he faces a mandatory jail sentence of at least three years.

Bates was remanded in custody awaiting a new hearing after the judge told him: "The restoration of stolen property can sometimes help victims.

"It is also an opportunity for defendants to show remorse – but that doesn't seem to have happened here."

Bates had broken into the house in Pardoner's Way, Dover, and stolen a 32-inch TV belonging to the child.

The child's mother had revealed in a victim impact statement that he was now too afraid to sleep in his bedroom after the burglary on October 2 last year.

Bates had admitted the daytime break-in at the house while the family were out.

He had also been told do 250 hours of unpaid work for the community.

But Bates then stunned the court when he spoke from the dock during his sentencing hearing two months ago, asking: "Can I say one thing? Could I return the telly?"

Judge Nigel Van Der Bijl

Judge Nigel Van Der Bijl

The judge replied: "Did you say: 'Could you return the telly?' Have you got it?"

Bates answered: "I know where it is", before the judge told him: "I think that would be an excellent idea."

He then told him the home electronically tagged curfew order would be scrapped if the stolen TV was returned to the victim within a month.

That never happened and Bates has never been subject to the tagging.

Click here for more news from Deal.

Click here for more news from around the county.

Sorry, comments are not enabled for this article.

Login or register to post commentsPost Comment

Forgotten Password?

Forgotten Username?

Don't have an account? Please Register first!

The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.


Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email or call 01634 227989.