Home   Dover   News   Article

Dover District Council members could fall from 45 to 35 in shake-up involving Boundary Commission

By Sam Lennon

Dover district could lose more than a fifth of its councillors in a new boundary shake-up.

There are recommendations to slash the numbers from 45 to about 35 in time for the next district election in 2019.

Details were explained in a report by district member Mike Eddy.

Dover District Council - major shake-up proposed

Dover District Council - major shake-up proposed

It said: “DDC has invited the Boundary Commission to review ward boundaries with a view to reducing councillor numbers from 45 to around 35.”

His report added that exactly how many councillors are needed will be worked out by December 8.

After that the number of voter expected in five years will be worked out .

Then new ward boundaries will be drawn, fitting with parish and county boundaries.

This has to be completed by December 2018, in time for the 2019 district elections.
There will be no effect on town and parish councils.

Cllr Eddy, both a Deal district and town councillor, presented his report to a Deal Town Council meeting.

This change is not connected with the previously proposed super-council made up of Dover, Shepway, Thanet Canterbury and Ashford.

Plans for that have been effectively shelved until the Brexit negotiations, preoccupying so many civil servants, are over.

Wards and councillor numbers regularly change with Boundary Commission involvement.

The amount of Dover district councillors went down to 45 by the time of the 2003 local elections, having previously been 56.

Shepway District Council’s elected membership shrank by a third by the time of the 2015 poll.

Its councillor numbers went down from 46 to 30, and 13 large wards replaced 22 smaller ones.

A boundary working party within Thanet District Council is currently looking into reducing the amount of members from 56 to 36.

The tendency lately has been to aim for more matching councillor/resident ratios. It is 1:2,495 in Thanet but 1:4.101 in Shepway.

Join the debate...
Comments |

Don't have an account? Please Register first!

The KM Group does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments
We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here, email multimediadesk@thekmgroup.co.uk or call 01634 227989.

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More