Home   Sittingbourne   News   Article

Care worker who abused elderly woman still awaits deportation

Awaiting deportation: Harry Perera
Awaiting deportation: Harry Perera

A Sri Lankan care worker convicted of sexual assault on an elderly woman with a mental disorder at a Sittingbourne care home is waiting to be deported.

Harry Perera, 59, was convicted of sexual assault last April and sentenced to 18 months in prison. But he has served less than that.

At the time of his conviction, it was said in court that deportation papers would be issued to him ready for when his visa expired in October 2007.

But he is still in the UK nine months later.

Perera has been banned from working in nursing homes and hospitals, is on the sex offenders register for 10 years and was this week struck off the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) register.

He had been working in the UK to support his family in Sri Lanka and had planned to bring them here for a better life.

But on March 28, 2006, he was caught by a colleague abusing a patient in his care at the Frank Lloyd Nursing Home in Bell Road.

He was immediately suspended and faced trial a year later, where he was convicted and sent to prison.

The Home Office cannot comment on individual cases and could not reveal why Perera is still here.

Foreign prisoners are automatically deported at the end of their sentence but it’s not a case of putting them on a plane and sending them off.

Liaison between the deporting and the receiving countries needs to take place and if an appeal against the deportation is lodged, this delays the process until the outcome is decided.

A spokesman said: “We do not comment on individual cases. We strongly believe that foreign lawbreakers should be held to account for breaking the law and be sent home. Last year we deported a record number of foreign prisoners (more than 4,200). This was 80 per cent more than the previous year.”

Guidelines issued by the Home Office state: 'The Human Rights Act must also be taken into account when establishing whether any interference with the person’s right to privacy and family life is proportionate. The criteria to be considered here include the persons’ length of residence in the UK, social integration into British society, their age, health and their economic situation.’

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More