Home   Kent   News   Article

Re-think over six-term year

GILL METCALF: “There has been some concern that when we went to the six-term model, there was not a great deal of change so we have looked at all the options"
GILL METCALF: “There has been some concern that when we went to the six-term model, there was not a great deal of change so we have looked at all the options"

SCHOOL holidays could face another shake-up in Kent if headteachers back changes that include the option of schools moving to a five-term year.

A working party of primary and secondary headteachers from Kent’s 600-plus schools says more radical reform could improve attendance, boost standards,, reduce stress on staff and pupils and make better use of “unproductive time” following exams.

The review follows concerns among heads that the introduction in Kent of what is known as the six-term year has failed to benefit schools.

That was introduced in 2005 and was supposed to help even out the length of school terms. It also fixed the Easter break.

But despite the re-organisation, there have continued to be terms ranging from five to eight weeks.

As a result, the working party says Kent should take a fresh look at the idea of a five-term year and consider introducing a two-week break in the middle of the Autumn term.

That could have the effect of shortening the summer holiday by about a week, something teaching unions have previously been resisted by teaching unions.

Gill Metcalf, headteacher of Upton Junior School in Broadstairs and chairman of the Kent Primary School forum, said:

“There has been some concern that when we went to the six-term model, there was not a great deal of change so we have looked at all the options. Many heads have said their staff would like two weeks in October, which is a long term and one where there can be more absence due to illness.”

For primary schools, the first term after Christmas often proved too short. “It can be very cramped as it is the term when the 11-plus is taken.”

Alan Barham, headteacher of Sittingbourne Community College and a member of the working group, said secondary schools could benefit by effectively starting a new school year immediately after the GCSE exams in June.

“It would be a better use of time. Instead of dead time or time that is not always used productively, new GCSE courses could start straightaway [in June]. The previous re-organisation did not really change anything.”

County education chiefs say the are open-minded about any proposals, which, if agreed, could come in next year.

The results of a consultation exercise with heads across the county is expected to be considered next month.

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More